-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[css-overflow-4] Draft spec for continue: collapse
(#7708)
#10816
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@emilio - Does this look reasonable to you? |
Before now, this PR allowed clamping between any two blocks, to make it closer to the |
b3b73b4
to
1699d89
Compare
In particular, the argument was that |
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791226 gecko-commit: c6ce92301ca11292a5dd25f07a80243592c94e5a gecko-reviewers: layout-reviewers, dshin
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791226 gecko-commit: cf9f54eef33465d089f850a55da5734a911fdac4 gecko-reviewers: layout-reviewers, dshin
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791226 gecko-commit: cf9f54eef33465d089f850a55da5734a911fdac4 gecko-reviewers: layout-reviewers, dshin
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 UltraBlame original commit: c6ce92301ca11292a5dd25f07a80243592c94e5a
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 UltraBlame original commit: cf9f54eef33465d089f850a55da5734a911fdac4
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 UltraBlame original commit: c6ce92301ca11292a5dd25f07a80243592c94e5a
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 UltraBlame original commit: cf9f54eef33465d089f850a55da5734a911fdac4
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 UltraBlame original commit: c6ce92301ca11292a5dd25f07a80243592c94e5a
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578 UltraBlame original commit: cf9f54eef33465d089f850a55da5734a911fdac4
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578
This matches the proposal in w3c/csswg-drafts#10816, and creates much better behavior. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D157578
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems mostly good. I've made a few small suggestion for normative changes, and more suggestions for editorial changes (most of which are about source formatting).
Most of the remaining issues are orthogonal to this PR, so I think we can merge first and keep working on those later, as soon as the comments on this PR are addressed.
that would receive subsequent content, | ||
then the content displaced by the <a>block overflow ellipsis</a> | ||
must be pushed to that <a>fragmentation container</a>. | ||
must be pushed to that <a>fragmentation container</a>. If it is placed before a [=clamp point=], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial:
must be pushed to that <a>fragmentation container</a>. If it is placed before a [=clamp point=], | |
must be pushed to that <a>fragmentation container</a>. | |
If it is placed before a [=clamp point=], |
Reason: this spec uses semantic line-breaks, and I'd prefer to stay consistent with that. See https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/
that would receive subsequent content, | ||
then the content displaced by the <a>block overflow ellipsis</a> | ||
must be pushed to that <a>fragmentation container</a>. | ||
must be pushed to that <a>fragmentation container</a>. If it is placed before a [=clamp point=], | ||
then the displaced content must be pushed to the remainder of the [=inline formatting context=]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm ok with that, but I think this has been controversial, with some advocating that the displaced content be dropped / invisible instead, in order to avoid that inserting the ellipsis would cause an extra layout pass. Should we open a separate issue to discuss that aspect?
Or maybe this is unavoidable due to bidi processing of the ellipsis, which means we have to relayout anyway?
@@ -844,7 +849,7 @@ Limiting Visible Lines: the 'line-clamp' shorthand property</h3> | |||
<dt><dfn><<integer [1,∞]>></dfn> | |||
</dt><dfn><'block-ellipsis'></dfn> | |||
<dd> | |||
Sets 'continue' to ''discard'' | |||
Sets 'continue' to ''collapse'' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sets 'continue' to ''collapse'' | |
Issue(7708): Whether this should imply ''discard'' or ''collapse'' is an unresolved question. | |
Sets 'continue' to ''collapse'' |
<var>N</var> is the computed value of 'max-lines': | ||
|
||
- If the box is a [=fragmentation container=] that captures [=region breaks=], | ||
a <a>region break</a> or |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a <a>region break</a> or | |
a <a>region break</a> |
If the value of 'max-lines' is not <dfn for=max-lines dfn-type=value>none</dfn>, then, where | ||
<var>N</var> is the computed value of 'max-lines': |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial:
If the value of 'max-lines' is not <dfn for=max-lines dfn-type=value>none</dfn>, then, where | |
<var>N</var> is the computed value of 'max-lines': | |
If the value of 'max-lines' is not <dfn for=max-lines dfn-type=value>none</dfn>, | |
then, given a [=computed value=] of <var>N</var>: |
- A point immediately after a [=line box=] in the line-clamp container's [=block formatting | ||
context=]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial
- A point immediately after a [=line box=] in the line-clamp container's [=block formatting | |
context=]. | |
- A point immediately after a [=line box=] | |
in the line-clamp container's [=block formatting context=]. |
See https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/
- The end of the line-clamp container, if there are any boxes after the last [=inline formatting | ||
context=] in the line-clamp container's [=block formatting context=]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial
- The end of the line-clamp container, if there are any boxes after the last [=inline formatting | |
context=] in the line-clamp container's [=block formatting context=]. | |
- The end of the line-clamp container, | |
if there are any boxes after the last [=inline formatting context=] | |
in the line-clamp container's [=block formatting context=]. |
See https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/
Any boxes in a [=line-clamp container=] that follow its [=clamp point=] in the box tree, as well | ||
as any [=line boxes=] that follow it inside an [=inline formatting context=], will be invisible | ||
(behaving like ''visibility: hidden''). This includes [=independent formatting contexts=] as | ||
well as [=out-of-flow=] boxes, and all of their descendants. Any overflow such boxes and line | ||
boxes might have is always counted as [=ink overflow=] rather than [=scrollable overflow=]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial
Any boxes in a [=line-clamp container=] that follow its [=clamp point=] in the box tree, as well | |
as any [=line boxes=] that follow it inside an [=inline formatting context=], will be invisible | |
(behaving like ''visibility: hidden''). This includes [=independent formatting contexts=] as | |
well as [=out-of-flow=] boxes, and all of their descendants. Any overflow such boxes and line | |
boxes might have is always counted as [=ink overflow=] rather than [=scrollable overflow=]. | |
Any boxes in a [=line-clamp container=] that follow its [=clamp point=] in the box tree, | |
as well as any [=line boxes=] that follow it inside an [=inline formatting context=], | |
will be invisible (behaving like ''visibility: hidden''). | |
This includes [=independent formatting contexts=] | |
as well as [=out-of-flow=] boxes, | |
and all of their descendants. | |
Any overflow such boxes and line boxes might have | |
is always counted as [=ink overflow=] rather than [=scrollable overflow=]. |
See https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/
If the [=line-clamp container=]'s [=block formatting context root=] has a [=computed value=] of | ||
'max-lines' other than ''max-lines/none'', then that property will determine the [=clamp point=]. | ||
Otherwise, the clamp point will be set to the last possible clamp point such that, for it and | ||
all previous possible clamp points, the line-clamp container's [=automatic block size=] (as | ||
determined below) is not greater than the [=block size=] the box would have if its automatic | ||
block size were infinite; or if that is not the case for any clamp points, to the first clamp | ||
point in the block formatting context. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial:
If the [=line-clamp container=]'s [=block formatting context root=] has a [=computed value=] of | |
'max-lines' other than ''max-lines/none'', then that property will determine the [=clamp point=]. | |
Otherwise, the clamp point will be set to the last possible clamp point such that, for it and | |
all previous possible clamp points, the line-clamp container's [=automatic block size=] (as | |
determined below) is not greater than the [=block size=] the box would have if its automatic | |
block size were infinite; or if that is not the case for any clamp points, to the first clamp | |
point in the block formatting context. | |
If the [=line-clamp container=]'s [=block formatting context root=] | |
has a [=computed value=] of 'max-lines' other than ''max-lines/none'', | |
then that property will determine the [=clamp point=]. | |
Otherwise, the clamp point will be set to the last possible clamp point | |
such that, for it and all previous possible clamp points, | |
the line-clamp container's [=automatic block size=] | |
(as determined below) | |
is not greater than the [=block size=] the box would have | |
if its automatic block size were infinite; | |
or if that is not the case for any possible clamp points, | |
to the first possible clamp point in the block formatting context. |
See https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/
I also added the word "possible" before "clamp point" in the last two lines.
This property only affects a line box if it immediately precedes | ||
eiher a [=region break=] or a [=clamp point=] in the [=block formatting context=]. | ||
If the [=clamp point=] is placed at the end of the [=line-clamp container=], then the line will | ||
not be affected. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial
This property only affects a line box if it immediately precedes | |
eiher a [=region break=] or a [=clamp point=] in the [=block formatting context=]. | |
If the [=clamp point=] is placed at the end of the [=line-clamp container=], then the line will | |
not be affected. | |
This property only affects a line box | |
if it immediately precedes eiher a [=region break=] | |
or a [=clamp point=] in the [=block formatting context=]. | |
If the [=clamp point=] is placed at the end of the [=line-clamp container=], | |
then the line will not be affected. |
Reason: this spec uses semantic line-breaks, and I'd prefer to stay consistent with that. See https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/
@tabatkins , for your comment in #10816 (comment), I'd suggest following up in #10868, because that aspect exists before this PR. The text of the spec may need to change depending on where we land on that issue (and others), but this PR isn't changing it, so I think we should take one problem at a time. |
No description provided.