chore: transaction history iterations #1410
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve enhancements to the transaction history components, introducing new state management for transaction status and loading states. A custom hook for initializing transactions is added, and components are updated to provide better user feedback during transaction retrieval. Additionally, new loading and error handling components are implemented to improve the overall user experience. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TransactionHistoryPage
participant ReduxStore
participant TransactionLoading
participant TransactionNotFound
User->>TransactionHistoryPage: Request transaction history
TransactionHistoryPage->>ReduxStore: Fetch transaction data
ReduxStore-->>TransactionHistoryPage: Return txnStatus
alt txnStatus is PENDING
TransactionHistoryPage->>TransactionLoading: Render loading component
else txnStatus is REJECTED
TransactionHistoryPage->>TransactionNotFound: Render not found component
else txnStatus is SUCCESS
TransactionHistoryPage->>User: Display transaction data
end
Poem
Tip We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/SearchTransaction.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/[hash]/loading.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/[hash]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/components/Transaction.tsx (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/components/TransactionHistoryDashboard.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/loaders/TransactionLoading.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/globals.css (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/custom-hooks/useGetTransactions.ts (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/custom-hooks/useInitTransactions.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/store/features/recent-transactions/recentTransactionsSlice.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (26)
frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/[hash]/loading.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM!The import statement change is approved. Using a specialized
TransactionLoadingcomponent instead of a genericPageLoadingcomponent is a good approach to provide a tailored loading experience for the transaction history page.
7-7: LGTM!The component rendering change is approved. Rendering the
TransactionLoadingcomponent is consistent with the import statement change and provides a specialized loading experience for the transaction history page.frontend/src/custom-hooks/useInitTransactions.tsx (1)
1-24: LGTM!The custom hook
useInitTransactionsis correctly implemented and follows the React hooks rules. It uses theuseAppDispatchhook to dispatch thegetAllTransactionsaction and theuseGetChainInfohook to get theaddressbased on thechainID. TheuseEffecthook has the correct dependency array withchainIDand dispatches thegetAllTransactionsaction with the correct parameters when thechainIDchanges. The custom hook is exported as the default export.The code changes are approved.
frontend/src/custom-hooks/useGetTransactions.ts (2)
31-39: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
2-5: Verify the impact of removing theuseEffecthook.The AI-generated summary indicates that the
useEffecthook for fetching transactions on component mount has been removed. However, this change is not directly visible in the provided code changes.Ensure that the removal of the
useEffecthook does not negatively impact the functionality of components that utilize this hook.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
useGetTransactionshook:Verification successful
Verification successful: Manual invocation of fetching functions compensates for the removed
useEffecthook.The
useGetTransactionshook is used inpage.tsxandTransactionHistoryDashboard.tsx, where transactions are fetched manually. This ensures that the removal of theuseEffecthook for automatic fetching does not negatively impact the functionality of components using this hook.
page.tsx: Transactions are fetched on component mount using auseEffecthook.TransactionHistoryDashboard.tsx: Transactions are fetched in response to a search query change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `useGetTransactions` hook. # Test: Search for the hook usage. Expect: Occurrences of the hook with manual invocation of `fetchTransactions` or `fetchTransaction`. rg --type typescript -A 10 $'useGetTransactions'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `useGetTransactions` hook. # Test: Search for the hook usage. Expect: Occurrences of the hook with manual invocation of `fetchTransactions` or `fetchTransaction`. rg --type ts -A 10 $'useGetTransactions'Length of output: 6590
frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/[hash]/page.tsx (4)
9-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
30-35: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
43-56: LGTM!The conditional rendering logic is correctly implemented and improves the user experience by:
- Providing visual feedback during transaction retrieval.
- Handling potential errors gracefully.
The code changes are approved.
63-77: LGTM!The
TransactionNotFoundcomponent is correctly implemented and enhances the robustness of the application by handling potential errors.The code changes are approved.
frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/loaders/TransactionLoading.tsx (1)
1-77: LGTM!The
TransactionLoadingcomponent is well-structured and follows common React practices. The use of loops to render repeated loading elements is efficient, and theshimmerclass is used consistently to create the loading skeleton effect. The sub-componentTransactionHeaderis also defined and used appropriately.The code changes are approved.
frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/SearchTransaction.tsx (2)
36-38: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
82-82: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/components/TransactionHistoryDashboard.tsx (2)
13-13: LGTM!The import statement for the custom hook
useInitTransactionsis correctly written.
18-18: Verify the functionality of theuseInitTransactionshook.Ensure that the
useInitTransactionshook is correctly initializing the transaction data based on thechainIDprop and that it does not introduce any unintended side effects.Run the following script to verify the hook's functionality:
Verification successful
Verification successful:
useInitTransactionshook functions as intended.The
useInitTransactionshook is correctly implemented to initialize transaction data based on thechainIDprop. It is used appropriately in theTransactionHistoryDashboardcomponent without introducing any unintended side effects.
- Hook definition:
frontend/src/custom-hooks/useInitTransactions.tsx- Hook usage:
frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/components/TransactionHistoryDashboard.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the `useInitTransactions` hook. # Test 1: Search for the hook implementation. Expect: The hook should initialize transaction data based on the `chainID` prop. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const useInitTransactions = ($$$) => { $$$ }' # Test 2: Search for the hook usage in other components. Expect: The hook should be used consistently with the same prop. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'useInitTransactions'Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the `useInitTransactions` hook. # Test 1: Search for the hook implementation. Expect: The hook should initialize transaction data based on the `chainID` prop. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const useInitTransactions = ($$$) => { $$$ }' # Test 2: Search for the hook usage in other components. Expect: The hook should be used consistently with the same prop. rg --type ts -A 5 useInitTransactionsLength of output: 2297
frontend/src/app/(routes)/transactions/history/[network]/components/Transaction.tsx (6)
16-16: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
48-48: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
123-133: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
185-197: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
190-195: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
69-69: Verify the impact of changing the initial state.Changing the initial state of
expandedIndexfromnullto0alters the default behavior of the component when it is rendered.Please ensure that this change is intended and does not introduce any unexpected behavior. Consider running the following script to verify the impact:
frontend/src/app/globals.css (2)
216-217: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
246-252: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
frontend/src/store/features/recent-transactions/recentTransactionsSlice.tsx (4)
187-204: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The check for the existence of
txnsDataprevents potential runtime errors, and the handling of IBC transactions is implemented correctly.
209-210: LGTM!The code changes are approved. Setting the
isIBCTxnflag tofalsefor non-IBC transactions clarifies the distinction between IBC and non-IBC transactions.
214-221: LGTM!The code changes are approved. Throwing an error when
txnsDatais not found ensures that the code does not proceed with invalid data, and capturing the error message directly from the caught error enhances the specificity of error reporting.
386-393: LGTM!The code changes are approved. Initializing
state.txn.dataas an empty array when no data is available ensures consistency in the state structure, and settingstate.txn.errorto the error message from the action provides clearer feedback on transaction failures.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Documentation