Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: dynamic setting deps layouts #2928

Conversation

Alexandr-Solovev
Copy link
Contributor

@Alexandr-Solovev Alexandr-Solovev commented Oct 1, 2024

Description

Add dynamic checker for TBB layout

Testing

  • I have run it locally and tested the changes extensively.
  • All CI jobs are green or I have provided justification why they aren't.

@Alexandr-Solovev Alexandr-Solovev changed the title init commit feature: dynamic setting deps layouts Oct 1, 2024
@Alexandr-Solovev Alexandr-Solovev marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2024 20:27
@Alexandr-Solovev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/intelci: run

@@ -214,15 +214,17 @@ TBBDIR.include := $(if $(TBBDIR.2),$(TBBDIR.2)/include/tbb $(TBBDIR.2)/include)

TBBDIR.libia.prefix := $(TBBDIR.2)/lib

ifeq ($(MKL_FPK_GPU_VERSION_LINE),2024.0.0)
OLD_TBB_LAYOUT := $(if $(wildcard $(call frompf1,$(TBBDIR.libia.prefix))/$(_IA)),yes,no)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to support old tbb layout?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible scenario that user will try to use tbb with old layout in build? I guess that just since 2021.12 or 13 new layout exists, it makes sense to support old layout, but not sure

@Alexandr-Solovev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/intelci: run

@Alexandr-Solovev Alexandr-Solovev merged commit 3b795cb into uxlfoundation:main Oct 9, 2024
17 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants