Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.0 #51

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.0 #51

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 22, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
react-router (source) 6.19.0 -> 6.28.0 age adoption passing confidence
react-router-dom (source) 6.19.0 -> 6.28.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

remix-run/react-router (react-router)

v6.28.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
    • Log deprecation warnings for v7 flags (#​11750)
    • Add deprecation warnings to json/defer in favor of returning raw objects
      • These methods will be removed in React Router v7
Patch Changes

v6.27.0: v6.27.0

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6270

v6.26.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.26.1

Compare Source

v6.26.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new replace(url, init?) alternative to redirect(url, init?) that performs a history.replaceState instead of a history.pushState on client-side navigation redirects (#​11811)
Patch Changes
  • Fix initial hydration behavior when using future.v7_partialHydration along with unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss (#​11838)
    • During initial hydration, router.state.matches will now include any partial matches so that we can render ancestor HydrateFallback components
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.25.1: v6.25.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6251

v6.25.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Stabilize future.unstable_skipActionErrorRevalidation as future.v7_skipActionErrorRevalidation (#​11769)

    • When this flag is enabled, actions will not automatically trigger a revalidation if they return/throw a Response with a 4xx/5xx status code
    • You may still opt-into revalidation via shouldRevalidate
    • This also changes shouldRevalidate's unstable_actionStatus parameter to actionStatus
Patch Changes
  • Fix regression and properly decode paths inside useMatch so matches/params reflect decoded params (#​11789)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • When using future.v7_relativeSplatPath, properly resolve relative paths in splat routes that are children of pathless routes (#​11633)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
    • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
    • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more
Patch Changes

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.1: v6.22.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6221

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with route.lazy not working correctly on initial SPA load when v7_partialHydration is specified (#​11121)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Routes>
    </div>
  );
}

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
function DashboardTeam() {
  // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
  return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;

  // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
  return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
}

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
  path: "/dashboard",
  children: [
    {
      path: "*",
      action: dashboardAction,
      Component() {
        // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
        // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
        // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
        return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
      },
    },
  ],
});

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Router>
    </div>
  );
}

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with resolveTo in splat routes (#​11045)
    • This is a follow up to #​10983 to handle the few other code paths using getPathContributingMatches
    • This removes the UNSAFE_getPathContributingMatches export from @remix-run/router since we no longer need this in the react-router/react-router-dom layers
  • Updated dependencies:
remix-run/react-router (react-router-dom)

v6.28.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
    • Log deprecation warnings for v7 flags (#​11750)
    • Add deprecation warnings to json/defer in favor of returning raw objects
      • These methods will be removed in React Router v7
Patch Changes

v6.27.0

Compare Source

v6.26.2

Compare Source

v6.26.1

Compare Source

v6.26.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new replace(url, init?) alternative to redirect(url, init?) that performs a history.replaceState instead of a history.pushState on client-side navigation redirects (#​11811)
Patch Changes
  • Fix initial hydration behavior when using future.v7_partialHydration along with unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss (#​11838)
    • During initial hydration, router.state.matches will now include any partial matches so that we can render ancestor HydrateFallback components
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.25.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.25.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Stabilize future.unstable_skipActionErrorRevalidation as future.v7_skipActionErrorRevalidation (#​11769)

    • When this flag is enabled, actions will not automatically trigger a revalidation if they return/throw a Response with a 4xx/5xx status code
    • You may still opt-into revalidation via shouldRevalidate
    • This also changes shouldRevalidate's unstable_actionStatus parameter to actionStatus
Patch Changes

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • Fix fetcher.submit types - remove incorrect navigate/fetcherKey/unstable_viewTransition options because they are only relevant for useSubmit (#​11631)
  • Allow falsy location.state values passed to <StaticRouter> (#​11495)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
    • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
    • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more
Patch Changes

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.1

Compare Source

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Include a window__reactRouterVersion tag for CWV Report detection (#​11222)
Patch Changes

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix NavLink isPending when a basename is used (#​11195)
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Routes>
    </div>
  );
}

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
function DashboardTeam() {
  // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
  return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;

  // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
  return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
}

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
  path: "/dashboard",
  children: [
    {
      path: "*",
      action: dashboardAction,
      Component() {
        // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
        // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
        // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
        return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
      },
    },
  ],
});

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Router>
    </div>
  );
}

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@sweep-ai Sweep AI
Copy link

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

  • Apply: All new business logic should have corresponding unit tests.
  • Apply: Refactor large functions to be more modular.
  • Apply: Add docstrings to all functions and file headers.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.20.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.20.1 Dec 1, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 06912dd to de02167 Compare December 1, 2023 23:36
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.20.1 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.21.0 Dec 13, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from de02167 to 5979df1 Compare December 13, 2023 22:32
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.21.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.21.1 Dec 21, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 5979df1 to f968703 Compare December 21, 2023 20:08
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from f968703 to 983de16 Compare January 11, 2024 18:48
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.21.1 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.21.2 Jan 11, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 983de16 to b97e450 Compare January 18, 2024 22:32
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.21.2 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.21.3 Jan 18, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from b97e450 to e92fbc1 Compare February 1, 2024 22:41
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.21.3 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.0 Feb 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from e92fbc1 to 262788f Compare February 16, 2024 22:55
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.1 Feb 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.1 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.2 Feb 28, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 262788f to 0a4e349 Compare February 28, 2024 22:10
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.2 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.3 Mar 7, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 0a4e349 to 606a5c8 Compare March 7, 2024 15:30
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 606a5c8 to 0461660 Compare April 23, 2024 16:09
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.3 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.23.0 Apr 23, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 0461660 to a6de2c9 Compare May 10, 2024 19:21
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.23.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.23.1 May 10, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from a6de2c9 to 31b8363 Compare June 24, 2024 20:05
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.23.1 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.24.0 Jun 24, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 31b8363 to 6f33c5f Compare July 3, 2024 13:44
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.24.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.24.1 Jul 3, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 6f33c5f to d87fe0b Compare July 16, 2024 14:13
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.24.1 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.25.0 Jul 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from d87fe0b to 4dd4a6c Compare July 17, 2024 18:16
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.25.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.25.1 Jul 17, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 4dd4a6c to 2ef58d5 Compare August 1, 2024 23:32
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.25.1 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.26.0 Aug 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 2ef58d5 to 425681f Compare August 15, 2024 17:27
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.26.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.26.1 Aug 15, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 425681f to 36d2c19 Compare September 9, 2024 16:05
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.26.1 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.26.2 Sep 9, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 36d2c19 to 23a70a8 Compare October 11, 2024 18:25
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.26.2 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.27.0 Oct 11, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 23a70a8 to 00901eb Compare November 7, 2024 00:11
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.27.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.0 Nov 7, 2024
@sweep-ai Sweep AI
Copy link

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Hey @renovate[bot], here is an example of how you can ask me to improve this pull request:

@Sweep Add unit tests for the new `replace(url, init?)` method to ensure it correctly performs a `history.replaceState` instead of a `history.pushState` on client-side navigation redirects.

📖 For more information on how to use Sweep, please read our documentation.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.0 fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.0 - autoclosed Dec 8, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Dec 8, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch December 8, 2024 18:34
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.0 - autoclosed fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.28.0 Dec 9, 2024
@renovate renovate bot reopened this Dec 9, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 22f8040 to 00901eb Compare December 9, 2024 00:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
size/S
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants