Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement a function to calculate the optimal CFL number for the PERK2 integrator and apply the necessary related updates #2083

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

warisa-r
Copy link
Contributor

This PR introduces a new function to compute the optimal CFL number based on the optimal time step for the PairedExplicitRK2 (PERK2) integrator.

  • Added dt_opt as a new attribute of PairedExplicitRK2 to store the optimal time step.
  • Modified the constructor of PairedExplicitRK2 that takes in the file path of the monomial coefficients to include an extra argument dt_opt, which is a breaking change Release v0.9 #1997.
  • Implemented calculate_cfl function to compute the CFL number from the optimal time step.
  • Created a new example demonstrating how to use the calculate_cfl function with the PERK2 integrator.
  • Added a test to validate the new example showing the usage of the calculate_cfl function with the PERK2 integrator.

Please let me know if there are any suggestions or improvements!
Original PR: #2077

warisa-r and others added 27 commits September 7, 2024 12:03
Co-authored-by: Daniel Doehring <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

  • The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
  • All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
  • No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

  • The code can be understood easily.
  • Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
  • There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
  • There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
  • The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

  • New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
  • Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
  • Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
  • Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
  • If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md with its PR number.

Testing

  • The PR passes all tests.
  • New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
  • New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

  • There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
  • If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

  • The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
  • If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results
    are posted in the PR.

Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.34%. Comparing base (da287ef) to head (452b132).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2083      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.32%   96.34%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         470      470              
  Lines       37492    37501       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        36114    36129      +15     
+ Misses       1378     1372       -6     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.34% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 18, 2024
@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring self-assigned this Sep 18, 2024
@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring self-requested a review September 18, 2024 06:45
@DanielDoehring DanielDoehring mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2024
10 tasks
@DanielDoehring
Copy link
Contributor

Re-opens #2077.

@sloede
Copy link
Member

sloede commented Sep 19, 2024

Please let us know once ready for review 🙂

@DanielDoehring
Copy link
Contributor

Please let us know once ready for review 🙂

Feel free to drop any comment, this is good to go (was already good to go 😅😬) from my side.

@sloede sloede enabled auto-merge (squash) September 28, 2024 04:03
@sloede sloede merged commit 1672c2a into trixi-framework:main Sep 28, 2024
37 checks passed
@warisa-r warisa-r deleted the updated_cfl_number_calculation branch September 28, 2024 05:23
@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented Sep 30, 2024

This is a breaking change, @sloede. Do you want to handle the breaking release right now?

@warisa-r warisa-r restored the updated_cfl_number_calculation branch October 1, 2024 02:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants