Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Add local and global limiting for StructuredMesh #1739

Conversation

bennibolm
Copy link
Contributor

@bennibolm bennibolm commented Nov 15, 2023

Adding the subcell local and global limiting support for StructuredMesh.

Getting the inverse Jacobian makes this PR a bit longer. That's because for TreeMesh, inverse_jacobian is fixed for one element, while it is different for each node for StructuredMesh.
To avoid something like

if mesh isa TreeMesh
    inverse_jacobian = cache.elements.inverse_jacobian[element]
end
for j in eachnode(dg), i in eachnode(dg)
    if mesh isa StructuredMesh
        inverse_jacobian = cache.elements.inverse_jacobian[i, j, element]
    end
    [...]
end

and also avoid unnecessary calls of inverse jacobian in TreeMesh simulations,
I dispatched for the mesh type and extracted the code [...] to an inner function.
After this PR, it will be straight forward to add support for P4estMesh.

For now, there is no support for non-conservative systems.

For now, I only added a free stream test including local and global limiting. Though, I think it doesn't make sense to merge another free stream elixir to main.
I will add a more interesting elixir (also for testing all new code) and delete the free stream elixir then.

Copy link
Contributor

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

  • The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
  • All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
  • No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

  • The code can be understood easily.
  • Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
  • There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
  • There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
  • The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

  • New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
  • Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
  • Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
  • Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
  • If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md.

Testing

  • The PR passes all tests.
  • New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
  • New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

  • There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
  • If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

  • The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
  • If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results
    are posted in the PR.

Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.36364% with 33 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.53%. Comparing base (01032aa) to head (c2e7496).

Files Patch % Lines
...rc/solvers/dgsem_structured/subcell_limiters_2d.jl 71.64% 19 Missing ⚠️
src/solvers/dgsem_tree/subcell_limiters_2d.jl 86.73% 13 Missing ⚠️
...llbacks_stage/subcell_limiter_idp_correction_2d.jl 95.24% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1739       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   96.31%   73.53%   -22.78%     
===========================================
  Files         440      443        +3     
  Lines       35797    35950      +153     
===========================================
- Hits        34476    26435     -8041     
- Misses       1321     9515     +8194     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 73.53% <86.36%> (-22.78%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bennibolm bennibolm marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2023 16:16
@bennibolm bennibolm changed the title WIP: Add local and global limiting for StructuredMesh Add local and global limiting for StructuredMesh Nov 16, 2023
@bennibolm bennibolm marked this pull request as draft November 17, 2023 09:13
@bennibolm bennibolm changed the title Add local and global limiting for StructuredMesh WIP: Add local and global limiting for StructuredMesh Nov 17, 2023
@bennibolm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Using new PR #1942 now.

@bennibolm bennibolm closed this May 14, 2024
@bennibolm bennibolm deleted the subcell-limiting-positivity-cons-structured branch May 22, 2024 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant