Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to tesseract version 0.20.0 #74

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2023

Conversation

rjoomen
Copy link
Contributor

@rjoomen rjoomen commented Oct 6, 2023

@rjoomen rjoomen requested a review from marrts October 6, 2023 12:07
@rjoomen rjoomen force-pushed the v0.20.0 branch 2 times, most recently from ddd7fad to 85e0e29 Compare October 6, 2023 12:21
Copy link
Contributor

@marrts marrts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, looks exactly the same as the tesseract_ros PR you referenced, so I assume it is good. I don't typically use the planning server node directly like this.

@rjoomen rjoomen merged commit da7ce37 into tesseract-robotics:master Oct 6, 2023
@rjoomen rjoomen deleted the v0.20.0 branch October 9, 2023 05:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants