added Authorization-Extras header for codec server #2228
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
|
3 tasks
|
Closing for #2250 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description & motivation 💭
The "Authorization-Extras" header is not forwarded to the codec-server when pass access token option is selected. In our Temporal set up we use this header to extract roles and restrict namespace access, we would like to implement this with our codec server as well, this change enables the "Authorization-Extras" header to be forwarded. Have opened an issue as well for this: #2227
Screenshots (if applicable) 📸
Design Considerations 🎨
Testing 🧪
How was this tested 👻
Steps for others to test: 🚶🏽♂️🚶🏽♀️
Checklists
Draft Checklist
Merge Checklist
Issue(s) closed
Docs
Any docs updates needed?