Refactor parseShapes function to simplify property checks and improve readability

[Ayoub-Mabrouk]

Refactor parseShapes function to simplify property checks and improve readability

• Combined checks for properties.P and properties.L into a single conditional statement.
• Replaced separate blocks for properties.P and properties.L with a ternary operator to set the type (0x01 for P, 0x02 for L).
• Updated the loop to start from 0 instead of 1 for consistency and clarity.
• Preserved the logic for reading buffer values and updating the buffer position after each iteration.

These changes streamline the function without altering its core behavior.

[dhensby]

I'm not a huge fan of the LLM contribution, but this seems an acceptable change.

Please amend the commit message as per conventional commit standard

[Ayoub-Mabrouk]

I'm not a huge fan of the LLM contribution, but this seems an acceptable change.

Please amend the commit message as per conventional commit standard

thanks for reviewing @dhensby, i try my best to make the pull request as clean as possible that's why i used it.
the commit message is clear now

[dhensby]

The commit must be amended, please. This is now 3 commits and not 1

[dhensby]

Thanks - after due consideration, I'm afraid I won't be accepting this (or your other PRs) because I believe they have been generated my a LLM.

Whilst this repo doesn't specifically have a policy on LLM based contributions, I don't think it's appropriate to allow contributions that have not been authored by a human. Not necessarily because these contributions are bad, but if I start accepting LLM based contributions it will start to encourage low-effort clout chasing in the repositories that I maintain. It will also save having my limited mental capacity exhausted by the practically infinite capacity of LLMs.