forked from bluez/bluetooth-next
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PW_SID:914536] Bluetooth: iso: Fix warnings #2021
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This patch adds workflow files for ci: [schedule_work.yml] - The workflow file for scheduled work - Sync the repo with upstream repo and rebase the workflow branch - Review the patches in the patchwork and creates the PR if needed [ci.yml] - The workflow file for CI tasks - Run CI tests when PR is created
This fixes circular locking dependency warnings, by ensuring the hci_dev_lock -> lock_sk order for all ISO functions. Below is an example of a warning generated because of locking dependencies: [ 75.307983] ====================================================== [ 75.307984] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 75.307985] 6.12.0-rc6+ #22 Not tainted [ 75.307987] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 75.307987] kworker/u81:2/2623 is trying to acquire lock: [ 75.307988] ffff8fde1769da58 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO) at: iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth] [ 75.308021] but task is already holding lock: [ 75.308022] ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock) at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308053] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 75.308054] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 75.308055] -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 75.308057] __mutex_lock+0xad/0xc50 [ 75.308061] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 75.308063] iso_sock_listen+0x143/0x5c0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308085] __sys_listen_socket+0x49/0x60 [ 75.308088] __x64_sys_listen+0x4c/0x90 [ 75.308090] x64_sys_call+0x2517/0x25f0 [ 75.308092] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150 [ 75.308095] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 75.308098] -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 75.308100] __lock_acquire+0x155e/0x25f0 [ 75.308103] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x300 [ 75.308105] lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x90 [ 75.308107] iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth] [ 75.308128] hci_connect_cfm+0x6c/0x190 [bluetooth] [ 75.308155] hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x27b/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308180] hci_le_meta_evt+0xe7/0x200 [bluetooth] [ 75.308206] hci_event_packet+0x21f/0x5c0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308230] hci_rx_work+0x3ae/0xb10 [bluetooth] [ 75.308254] process_one_work+0x212/0x740 [ 75.308256] worker_thread+0x1bd/0x3a0 [ 75.308258] kthread+0xe4/0x120 [ 75.308259] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 75.308261] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 75.308263] other info that might help us debug this: [ 75.308264] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 75.308264] CPU0 CPU1 [ 75.308265] ---- ---- [ 75.308265] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 75.308267] lock(sk_lock- AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO); [ 75.308268] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 75.308269] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO); [ 75.308270] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 75.308271] 4 locks held by kworker/u81:2/2623: [ 75.308272] #0: ffff8fdd66e52148 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0x740 [ 75.308276] #1: ffffafb488b7fe48 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)), at: process_one_work+0x1ce/0x740 [ 75.308280] #2: ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3} at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308304] #3: ffffffffb6ba4900 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: hci_connect_cfm+0x29/0x190 [bluetooth] Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu <[email protected]>
Since hci_get_route holds the device before returning, the hdev should be released with hci_dev_put at the end of iso_listen_bis even if the function returns with an error. Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu <[email protected]>
This updates iso_sock_accept to use nested locking for the parent socket, to avoid lockdep warnings caused because the parent and child sockets are locked by the same thread: [ 41.585683] ============================================ [ 41.585688] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 41.585694] 6.12.0-rc6+ #22 Not tainted [ 41.585701] -------------------------------------------- [ 41.585705] iso-tester/3139 is trying to acquire lock: [ 41.585711] ffff988b29530a58 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH) at: bt_accept_dequeue+0xe3/0x280 [bluetooth] [ 41.585905] but task is already holding lock: [ 41.585909] ffff988b29533a58 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH) at: iso_sock_accept+0x61/0x2d0 [bluetooth] [ 41.586064] other info that might help us debug this: [ 41.586069] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 41.586072] CPU0 [ 41.586076] ---- [ 41.586079] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH); [ 41.586086] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH); [ 41.586093] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 41.586097] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 41.586101] 1 lock held by iso-tester/3139: [ 41.586107] #0: ffff988b29533a58 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH) at: iso_sock_accept+0x61/0x2d0 [bluetooth] Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu <[email protected]>
github-actions
bot
force-pushed
the
workflow
branch
4 times, most recently
from
December 11, 2024 17:23
9d98f68
to
cf5068d
Compare
github-actions
bot
force-pushed
the
workflow
branch
from
December 12, 2024 21:24
cf5068d
to
a7b2f17
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes circular locking dependency warnings, by ensuring
the hci_dev_lock -> lock_sk order for all ISO functions.
Below is an example of a warning generated because of locking
dependencies:
[ 75.307983] ======================================================
[ 75.307984] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 75.307985] 6.12.0-rc6+ #22 Not tainted
[ 75.307987] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 75.307987] kworker/u81:2/2623 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 75.307988] ffff8fde1769da58 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO)
at: iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308021]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 75.308022] ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock)
at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308053]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 75.308054]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 75.308055]
-> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 75.308057] __mutex_lock+0xad/0xc50
[ 75.308061] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[ 75.308063] iso_sock_listen+0x143/0x5c0 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308085] __sys_listen_socket+0x49/0x60
[ 75.308088] __x64_sys_listen+0x4c/0x90
[ 75.308090] x64_sys_call+0x2517/0x25f0
[ 75.308092] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150
[ 75.308095] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 75.308098]
-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[ 75.308100] __lock_acquire+0x155e/0x25f0
[ 75.308103] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x300
[ 75.308105] lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x90
[ 75.308107] iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308128] hci_connect_cfm+0x6c/0x190 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308155] hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x27b/0x2f0 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308180] hci_le_meta_evt+0xe7/0x200 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308206] hci_event_packet+0x21f/0x5c0 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308230] hci_rx_work+0x3ae/0xb10 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308254] process_one_work+0x212/0x740
[ 75.308256] worker_thread+0x1bd/0x3a0
[ 75.308258] kthread+0xe4/0x120
[ 75.308259] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70
[ 75.308261] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 75.308263]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 75.308264] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 75.308264] CPU0 CPU1
[ 75.308265] ---- ----
[ 75.308265] lock(&hdev->lock);
[ 75.308267] lock(sk_lock-
AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO);
[ 75.308268] lock(&hdev->lock);
[ 75.308269] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO);
[ 75.308270]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 75.308271] 4 locks held by kworker/u81:2/2623:
[ 75.308272] #0: ffff8fdd66e52148 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0},
at: process_one_work+0x443/0x740
[ 75.308276] #1: ffffafb488b7fe48 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)),
at: process_one_work+0x1ce/0x740
[ 75.308280] #2: ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}
at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth]
[ 75.308304] #3: ffffffffb6ba4900 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2},
at: hci_connect_cfm+0x29/0x190 [bluetooth]
Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu [email protected]
net/bluetooth/iso.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)