When a location is requested by ID, sort its children location by name #421
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e, it helps to organize the user interface.
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Security Recommendations🔒 Security Insights for this Pull Request:
Recommendation: Conduct thorough testing to validate the sorting implementation, especially with edge cases involving special characters and large datasets. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/internal/data/repo/repo_locations.go (1)
167-169: Sorting child locations by name is a welcome improvement!
- Sorting logic looks correct, and it aligns with the PR objective to consistently display child locations in alphabetical order.
- Performance hint: For very large sets of child locations, ensure that an index is created on the
namefield at the database level to preserve efficient query performance.- Security advice: Since this code deals with hierarchical location data, verify that the user or service has the proper authorization to see all child locations. While
enthelps mitigate SQL injection via parameterized queries, always confirm that role-based access checks or location-ownership checks are in place to prevent unauthorized data exposure.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
It sorts the results of requests of locations by ID, it sorts the child location. This way it appears sorted by name in the user interface as almost everything is sorted by name. It helps to find and navigate through locations making the order predictable.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #412
Testing
Access a location and add children locations to it, no matter the order the locations are inserted it needs to appear sorted by name.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes