Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/doc up #3420

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2024
Merged

Fix/doc up #3420

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2024

Conversation

trajan0x
Copy link
Contributor

@trajan0x trajan0x commented Nov 30, 2024

Description
A clear and concise description of the features you're adding in this pull request.

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem you're solving.

Metadata

  • Fixes #[Link to Issue]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the document title from "RFQ" to "Synapse Intent Network."
    • Clarified the introduction to emphasize the intent-centric bridging system.
    • Modified section headers and terminology for consistency with the new title.
    • Preserved core content while enhancing coherence in wording.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a rebranding of the documentation for the Request-For-Quote (RFQ) process, changing the title to "Synapse Intent Network." It includes updates to the introduction, section headers, and terminology throughout the document to align with the new title. Key roles and processes remain intact, with minor wording adjustments for coherence. The architecture section is modified to reflect the new branding, while the descriptions of the Quoter API and FastBridge Smart Contracts are mostly unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/index.md Title changed from "RFQ" to "Synapse Intent Network"; introduction and section headers updated; terminology adjusted; core content and structure retained.

Possibly related PRs

  • first pass at updating RFQ relayer documentation #3000: This PR updates RFQ relayer documentation, which is directly related to the main PR's focus on rebranding and clarifying RFQ-related content.
  • Updating rfq contracts in docs #3041: This PR enhances the documentation for RFQ contracts, which aligns with the main PR's changes to the RFQ documentation, emphasizing the new terminology and structure.
  • Docs/fix #3222: This PR includes updates to the RFQ documentation, specifically clarifying the RFQ Router's role, which is relevant to the main PR's rebranding efforts.

Suggested reviewers

  • trajan0x

🐇 "In the fields where the rabbits play,
The RFQ's now a new bouquet.
Synapse Intent, a name so bright,
Bridging users, relayers in sight.
With words refined, we hop along,
In documentation, we sing our song!" 🎶


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9652d8 and 1b52653.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/index.md (2 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@trajan0x trajan0x merged commit 225a467 into master Nov 30, 2024
11 checks passed
@trajan0x trajan0x deleted the fix/doc-up branch November 30, 2024 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant