Add data in place of feline-data_v2.csv, closes #717

episodes/04-data-structures-part1.Rmd

@@ -164,34 +164,26 @@ No matter how
 complicated our analyses become, all data in R is interpreted as one of these
 basic data types. This strictness has some really important consequences.
 
-A user has added details of another cat. This information is in the file
-`data/feline-data_v2.csv`.
+A user has added details of another cat. We can add an additional row to our cats `data.frame` using `rbind`.
 
-```{r, eval=FALSE}
-file.show("data/feline-data_v2.csv")
-```
-
-```{r, eval=FALSE}
-coat,weight,likes_catnip
-calico,2.1,1
-black,5.0,0
-tabby,3.2,1
-tabby,2.3 or 2.4,1
+```{r}
+additional_cat <- data.frame(coat = "tabby", weight = "2.3 or 2.4", likes_catnip = 1)
+cats2 <- rbind(cats, additional_cat)
+cats2
 ```
 
-Load the new cats data like before, and check what type of data we find in the
-`weight` column:
+Let's check what type of data we find in the
+`weight` column of our new object:
 
 ```{r}
-cats <- read.csv(file="data/feline-data_v2.csv")
-typeof(cats$weight)
+typeof(cats2$weight)
 ```
 
 Oh no, our weights aren't the double type anymore! If we try to do the same math
 we did on them before, we run into trouble:
 
 ```{r}
-cats$weight + 2
+cats2$weight + 2
 ```
 
 What happened?
@@ -206,7 +198,7 @@ csv file, it is stored as a data frame. We can recognize data frames by the firs
 is written by the `str()` function:
 
 ```{r}
-str(cats)
+str(cats2)
 ```
 
 *Data frames* are composed of rows and columns, where each column has the
@@ -389,8 +381,7 @@ Create a new script in RStudio and copy and paste the following code. Then
 move on to the tasks below, which help you to fill in the gaps (\_\_\_\_\_\_).
 
 ```
-# Read data
-cats <- read.csv("data/feline-data_v2.csv")
+Using the object `cats2`:
 
 # 1. Print the data
 _____
@@ -402,15 +393,15 @@ _____(cats)
 #    The correct data type is: ____________.
 
 # 4. Correct the 4th weight data point with the mean of the two given values
-cats$weight[4] <- 2.35
+cats2$weight[4] <- 2.35
 #    print the data again to see the effect
 cats
 
 # 5. Convert the weight to the right data type
-cats$weight <- ______________(cats$weight)
+cats2$weight <- ______________(cats2$weight)
 
 #    Calculate the mean to test yourself
-mean(cats$weight)
+mean(cats2$weight)
 
 # If you see the correct mean value (and not NA), you did the exercise
 # correctly!
@@ -420,7 +411,7 @@ mean(cats$weight)
 
 #### 1\. Print the data
 
-Execute the first statement (`read.csv(...)`). Then print the data to the
+Print the data to the
 console
 
 :::::::::::::::  solution
@@ -435,8 +426,8 @@ Show the content of any variable by typing its name.
 Two correct solutions:
 
 ```
-cats
-print(cats)
+cats2
+print(cats2)
 ```
 
 :::::::::::::::::::::::::
@@ -445,7 +436,7 @@ print(cats)
 
 The data type of your data is as important as the data itself. Use a
 function we saw earlier to print out the data types of all columns of the
-`cats` table.
+`cats2` `data.frame`.
 
 :::::::::::::::  solution
 
@@ -462,15 +453,14 @@ here.
 > ### Solution to Challenge 1.2
 > 
 > ```
-> str(cats)
+> str(cats2)
 > ```
 
 #### 3\. Which data type do we need?
 
 The shown data type is not the right one for this data (weight of
 a cat). Which data type do we need?
 
-- Why did the `read.csv()` function not choose the correct data type?
 - Fill in the gap in the comment with the correct data type for cat weight!
 
 :::::::::::::::  solution
@@ -549,8 +539,8 @@ auto-complete function: Type "`as.`" and then press the TAB key.
 > There are two functions that are synonymous for historic reasons:
 > 
 > ```
-> cats$weight <- as.double(cats$weight)
-> cats$weight <- as.numeric(cats$weight)
+> cats2$weight <- as.double(cats2$weight)
+> cats2$weight <- as.numeric(cats2$weight)
 > ```
 
 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::