Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(realtime): Bump up docker image to 2.30.34 #2651

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

fix(realtime): Bump up docker image to 2.30.34 #2651

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

filipecabaco
Copy link
Contributor

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bump up docker image to 2.30.34

@filipecabaco filipecabaco marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2024 18:28
@filipecabaco filipecabaco requested a review from a team as a code owner September 2, 2024 18:28
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10671671863

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 5 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 60.023%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
internal/gen/keys/keys.go 5 12.9%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10661635423: -0.03%
Covered Lines: 6363
Relevant Lines: 10601
💛 - Coveralls

@sweatybridge sweatybridge changed the title realtime: Bump up docker image to 2.30.34 fix(realtime): Bump up docker image to 2.30.34 Sep 2, 2024
@sweatybridge sweatybridge merged commit bef875f into develop Sep 2, 2024
12 checks passed
@sweatybridge sweatybridge deleted the realtime/bump-up-image branch September 2, 2024 23:59
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sweatybridge sweatybridge sweatybridge approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@filipecabaco @coveralls @sweatybridge