Do not index data when fullBlock does not exist logs

[yoozo]

Description

Do not index data when fullBlock does not exist logs.

Fixes subquery#2575

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

Checklist

• I have tested locally
• I have performed a self review of my changes
• Updated any relevant documentation
• Linked to any relevant issues
• I have added tests relevant to my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
• My code is up to date with the base branch
• I have updated relevant changelogs. We suggest using chan

[github-actions]

Coverage report

Caution

Test run failed

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🔴	Statements	53.49%	3330/6226
🟡	Branches	69.81%	430/616
🔴	Functions	52.3%	148/283
🔴	Lines	53.49%	3330/6226

Test suite run failed

Failed tests: 1/96. Failed suites: 1/14.

  ● rawBlockToEthBlock › can fetch receipts

    expect(received).resolves.not.toThrow()

    Received promise rejected instead of resolved
    Rejected to value: [TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'from')]

      110 |     const block = rawBlockToEthBlock(raw, api);
      111 |
    > 112 |     await expect(block.block.transactions[0].receipt()).resolves.not.toThrow();
          |           ^
      113 |   });
      114 | });
      115 |

      at expect (node_modules/expect/build/index.js:105:15)
      at Object.<anonymous> (packages/node/src/indexer/dictionary/v2/utils.spec.ts:112:11)

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 34b3237

[stwiname]

I think a better test would find a real block with no logs.

[stwiname]

This doesn't make sense to me. It should still be possible to index a block without logs