Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move Google Pay to a ConfirmationDefinition type #9693

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

samer-stripe
Copy link
Collaborator

@samer-stripe samer-stripe commented Nov 22, 2024

Summary

Move Google Pay to a ConfirmationDefinition type

Motivation

Last confirmation type in DefaultConfirmationHandler that needs to be become a definition.

Testing

  • Added tests
  • Modified tests
  • Manually verified

@samer-stripe samer-stripe force-pushed the samer/move-gpay-to-confirmation-definition branch from 5ef6257 to f7d8e5b Compare November 22, 2024 07:22
@samer-stripe samer-stripe added the embedded-confirmation Related to Embedded project in terms of confirmation work label Nov 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Diffuse output:

OLD: identity-example-release-base.apk (signature: V1, V2)
NEW: identity-example-release-pr.apk (signature: V1, V2)

          │          compressed          │         uncompressed         
          ├───────────┬───────────┬──────┼───────────┬───────────┬──────
 APK      │ old       │ new       │ diff │ old       │ new       │ diff 
──────────┼───────────┼───────────┼──────┼───────────┼───────────┼──────
      dex │     2 MiB │     2 MiB │  0 B │   4.1 MiB │   4.1 MiB │  0 B 
     arsc │     1 MiB │     1 MiB │  0 B │     1 MiB │     1 MiB │  0 B 
 manifest │   2.3 KiB │   2.3 KiB │  0 B │     8 KiB │     8 KiB │  0 B 
      res │ 301.8 KiB │ 301.8 KiB │  0 B │ 455.5 KiB │ 455.5 KiB │  0 B 
   native │   6.2 MiB │   6.2 MiB │  0 B │  15.8 MiB │  15.8 MiB │  0 B 
    asset │   7.1 KiB │   7.1 KiB │  0 B │   6.9 KiB │   6.9 KiB │  0 B 
    other │  90.2 KiB │  90.2 KiB │ -7 B │ 170.3 KiB │ 170.3 KiB │  0 B 
──────────┼───────────┼───────────┼──────┼───────────┼───────────┼──────
    total │   9.6 MiB │   9.6 MiB │ -7 B │  21.5 MiB │  21.5 MiB │  0 B 

 DEX     │ old   │ new   │ diff      
─────────┼───────┼───────┼───────────
   files │     1 │     1 │ 0         
 strings │ 19966 │ 19966 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
   types │  6188 │  6188 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
 classes │  4979 │  4979 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
 methods │ 29759 │ 29759 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
  fields │ 17526 │ 17526 │ 0 (+0 -0) 

 ARSC    │ old  │ new  │ diff 
─────────┼──────┼──────┼──────
 configs │  164 │  164 │  0   
 entries │ 3622 │ 3622 │  0
APK
   compressed    │   uncompressed   │                        
──────────┬──────┼───────────┬──────┤                        
 size     │ diff │ size      │ diff │ path                   
──────────┼──────┼───────────┼──────┼────────────────────────
 28.4 KiB │ -9 B │  62.9 KiB │  0 B │ ∆ META-INF/CERT.SF     
 25.3 KiB │ +2 B │  62.8 KiB │  0 B │ ∆ META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 
──────────┼──────┼───────────┼──────┼────────────────────────
 53.7 KiB │ -7 B │ 125.7 KiB │  0 B │ (total)

Base automatically changed from samer/move-bacs-to-confirmation-definition to master November 22, 2024 07:35
@samer-stripe samer-stripe force-pushed the samer/move-gpay-to-confirmation-definition branch from f7d8e5b to 24eb230 Compare November 22, 2024 15:29
@samer-stripe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also a large PR, about 200 lines of production code changes accompanied by about ~630 lines of test code changes

@samer-stripe samer-stripe force-pushed the samer/move-gpay-to-confirmation-definition branch from 24eb230 to 2a48304 Compare November 22, 2024 16:22
@samer-stripe samer-stripe marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2024 16:22
@samer-stripe samer-stripe requested review from a team as code owners November 22, 2024 16:23
): ConfirmationDefinition.Result {
return when (result) {
is GooglePayPaymentMethodLauncher.Result.Completed -> {
val nextConfirmationOption = PaymentMethodConfirmationOption.Saved(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure this is perfect. But at a minimum, so much better than modeling this as a PaymentSelection!

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed! I'd like to come up with a solution in which we don't model from one option to another. It is hard though because we have quite a few options that convert from one option to another or modify an option. Something we should think about after the architecture changes.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thinking more about this. It does kinda seem like the job of this definition to do this. So it feels right.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a couple ideas that involve a solution using PaymentConfirmationMetadata that may work.

@samer-stripe samer-stripe merged commit 75615c0 into master Nov 22, 2024
13 checks passed
@samer-stripe samer-stripe deleted the samer/move-gpay-to-confirmation-definition branch November 22, 2024 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
embedded-confirmation Related to Embedded project in terms of confirmation work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants