Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Neutron namespace drain role #357

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

assumptionsandg
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@assumptionsandg assumptionsandg requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2024 12:07
@assumptionsandg assumptionsandg changed the title Add Neutrom namespace drain role Add Neutron namespace drain role Dec 9, 2024
@assumptionsandg assumptionsandg force-pushed the add-neutron-namespace-role branch from dc1de59 to 260fc76 Compare December 9, 2024 12:08
@stackhpc-ci
Copy link
Contributor

stackhpc-ci commented Dec 9, 2024

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success

Terraform Initialization ⚙️success

Terraform Validation 🤖success

Validation Output

Success! The configuration is valid.


Terraform Plan 📖success

Show Plan

undefined

Pusher: @assumptionsandg, Action: pull_request, Working Directory: ``, Workflow: Terraform GitHub

Copy link
Contributor

@MaxBed4d MaxBed4d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Went through and discussed with Jake.

Copy link
Member

@mnasiadka mnasiadka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wasn't the openstack-ops collection created for such purpose?

@assumptionsandg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wasn't the openstack-ops collection created for such purpose?

I didn't know about that collection, but it seems like a better candidate for the role. Closing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants