Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Metaless surgery, realistic fail conditions, and harsher consequences #70

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Metaless surgery, realistic fail conditions, and harsher consequences #70

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

BlueNexus
Copy link
Collaborator

isSurgeon will be a new variable set in the mind of the player's mob, which decides whether or not they can flawlessly perform surgery. if they're a bartender, they're obviously not going to be as good at surgery as a Doctor, for example. If they fail the check, they have a 50/50 chance of failing every surgical step.

Also added a fail_next_op var, which will fire if the player moves, is attacked, or does any other physical action while performing surgery. No more walking away from the table, and walking back in time for the step to complete.

@BlueNexus BlueNexus changed the title isSurgeon check for surgery, and new ways to fail Metaless surgery, realistic fail conditions, and harsher consequences Aug 26, 2015
@BlueNexus BlueNexus closed this Sep 4, 2015
@BlueNexus BlueNexus reopened this Sep 4, 2015
//We had proper tools! (or RNG smiled.) and user did not move or change hands.
if(prob(S.tool_quality(tool)) && do_mob(user, M, rand(S.min_duration, S.max_duration)))
if(prob(S.tool_quality(tool)) && do_mob(user, M, rand(S.min_duration, S.max_duration)) && ((user.mind.isSurgeon) || (!user.mind.isSurgeon) && (prob(50))) && (!user.fail_next_op)) //if they aren't a surgeon, give them a 50% chance of succeeding

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That !user.mind.isSurgeon is completely redundant. (A || !A && B) is equals to just A || B.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

...Oh. I'll adjust that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants