mention strun package name usage in docs

[braingram]

Following spacetelescope/stpipe#202 stpipe allows providing a package name to resolve ambiguous aliases provided to strun:

strun romancal::resample ...

This PR adds a note to the docs about when this might be needed.

Link to docs (note is at the end of this section): https://roman-pipeline--1476.org.readthedocs.build/en/1476/roman/pipeline_run.html#from-the-command-line

As the current stpipe required version doesn't support this I'll leave this PR as draft but request reviews for comments on the wording.

This PR makes no code changes so regression tests were not run.

Tasks

• request a review from someone specific, to avoid making the maintainers review every PR
• add a build milestone, i.e. 24Q4_B15 (use the latest build if not sure)
• Does this PR change user-facing code / API? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
  • write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
  • update or add relevant tests
  • update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
  • start a regression test and include a link to the running job (click here for instructions)
    • Do truth files need to be updated ("okified")?
      • after the reviewer has approved these changes, run okify_regtests to update the truth files
• if a JIRA ticket exists, make sure it is resolved properly

news fragment change types...

• changes/<PR#>.general.rst: infrastructure or miscellaneous change
• changes/<PR#>.docs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.stpipe.rst
• changes/<PR#>.associations.rst
• changes/<PR#>.scripts.rst
• changes/<PR#>.mosaic_pipeline.rst
• changes/<PR#>.patch_match.rst

steps

• changes/<PR#>.dq_init.rst
• changes/<PR#>.saturation.rst
• changes/<PR#>.refpix.rst
• changes/<PR#>.linearity.rst
• changes/<PR#>.dark_current.rst
• changes/<PR#>.jump_detection.rst
• changes/<PR#>.ramp_fitting.rst
• changes/<PR#>.assign_wcs.rst
• changes/<PR#>.flatfield.rst
• changes/<PR#>.photom.rst
• changes/<PR#>.flux.rst
• changes/<PR#>.source_detection.rst
• changes/<PR#>.tweakreg.rst
• changes/<PR#>.skymatch.rst
• changes/<PR#>.outlier_detection.rst
• changes/<PR#>.resample.rst
• changes/<PR#>.source_catalog.rst

[schlafly]

Thanks!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.77%. Comparing base (573d961) to head (814815f).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1476   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.77%   76.77%           
=======================================
  Files         118      118           
  Lines        7747     7747           
=======================================
  Hits         5948     5948           
  Misses       1799     1799           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mairanteodoro]

Looks good to me!

[braingram]

I brought this out of draft since now stpipe main has changes (spacetelescope/stpipe#195) useful to romancal.

I updated this PR to point to stpipe main and started regtests here:
https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/12169143665

[braingram]

Regtests all passed so merging.