replace usages of copy_arrays with memmap

[zacharyburnett]

follow-on to asdf-format/asdf#1797

Checklist

• Added entry in CHANGES.rst under the corresponding subsection
• updated relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• Passed romancal regression testing on Jenkins / PLWishMaster. Link: https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/job/RT/job/romancal/XXX/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.20%. Comparing base (087a60d) to head (7608ae5).
Report is 58 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #360      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.56%   97.20%   -0.36%     
==========================================
  Files          30       37       +7     
  Lines        2788     3359     +571     
==========================================
+ Hits         2720     3265     +545     
- Misses         68       94      +26     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[braingram]

Bumping the asdf version to at least 3.1.0 should fix the oldest deps:

roman_datamodels/pyproject.toml

Line 16 in 1b298e1

"asdf >=2.15.0",

[PaulHuwe]

Can you please add a RCAL regression test URL as well?

[zacharyburnett]

Can you please add a RCAL regression test URL as well?

RCAL regtest running at https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/10042547798 with this branch installed

[zacharyburnett]

a few failures in RCAL regtests: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/10042547798/attempts/2#summary-27759909972

[braingram]

a few failures in RCAL regtests: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/10042547798/attempts/2#summary-27759909972

The failures are unrelated (they're expected and caused by spacetelescope/romancal#1241).

Would you re-run them? I okified the results from a different run but I think that wasn't until after your tests had run.

[zacharyburnett]

sure, rerunning here: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/10042547798

[braingram]

The oldest deps failure should be solvable with a bump to the gwcs version:
https://github.com/spacetelescope/roman_datamodels/actions/runs/10045391464/job/27762571944?pr=360#step:10:292

[braingram]

Sorry for the back and forth but this will likely need another run. It turns out that some of the roman tests continue to fail after the first "okify": spacetelescope/romancal#1325 I have a run on main to test if the current "okified" results pass. I'll post and update here once the run on main passes.

[braingram]

I re-ran the regtests for this PR (now that the romancal main ones are passing):
https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/10042547798

The run with this PR shows all passing tests.

[braingram]

LGTM!