-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport PR #3319 on branch v4.0.x (Respect loaded mask cube properly in spectral extraction.) #3348
Backport PR #3319 on branch v4.0.x (Respect loaded mask cube properly in spectral extraction.) #3348
Conversation
…telescope#3299) * fix: golden layout not rendering when created outside viewport Since Lab 4.2 cells outside the viewport get the style "display: none" which causes the content to not have height. This causes an error in size calculations of golden layout from which it doesn't recover. * Add changelog --------- Co-authored-by: Ricky O'Steen <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 7e5ddfa)
…cope#3319) * Track loaded mask cube in cubeviz * First pass at handling mask cube in extraction * Fix type * Add changelog * Handle mask cubes that have NaNs instead of 0s * Act on copy of this mask array * Don't save DQ array as loaded_mask for JWST * Add snackbar warning and note in docs * codestyle * Add extraction test on file with mask * Codestyle (cherry picked from commit bf8cb26)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Is there another PR need backporting first?
|
Maybe you can cherry pick that into this PR too. |
Ahh, #3327 wasn't marked with the backport label. I'll cherry pick it here (or actually, will adding the label now still pick it up automatically?). |
* removing filter warning for mpl-scatter-density * replace deprecated pkg_resources call in linelists (cherry picked from commit 3f1abf7)
I cherry picked the commit from @bmorris3's PR fixing the deprecation warning to here. |
Hmm is there something else?
|
It looks like this is just a slightly too small RTOL on a very small number, the test has previously passed and this was just slightly outside the range. I think it's a precision thing. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v4.0.x #3348 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.64% 88.64%
=======================================
Files 125 125
Lines 18795 18813 +18
=======================================
+ Hits 16661 16677 +16
- Misses 2134 2136 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Given the discussion on #3350 , should we revert the rtol change here? |
Backporting #3319