Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[resotocore][feat] introduce refine-resource-data command #1937

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

aquamatthias
Copy link
Member

Description

To-Dos

  • I have created tests for any new or updated functionality.
  • I ran tox successfully.

Code of Conduct

By submitting this pull request, I agree to follow the code of conduct.

meln1k
meln1k previously approved these changes Feb 21, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (1202408) 89.93% compared to head (5540e9d) 89.94%.

Files Patch % Lines
resotocore/resotocore/cli/command.py 94.28% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1937      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.93%   89.94%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          94       94              
  Lines       16647    16684      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits        14971    15006      +35     
- Misses       1676     1678       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
resotocore 89.94% <94.59%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aquamatthias aquamatthias merged commit 4011f20 into main Feb 22, 2024
8 checks passed
@aquamatthias aquamatthias deleted the mv/refine_resource branch February 22, 2024 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants