Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[legacy_promotions]: Correct decorator naming #5946

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

mamhoff
Copy link
Contributor

@mamhoff mamhoff commented Nov 20, 2024

Summary

This changes the file names of decorators in the solidus_legacy_promotions gem to match Zeitwerk's expectations.
solidus_promotions is actually entirely fine.

This has been tested with solidusio/solidus_support#87, but is fully compatible with the classic way of loading each and every decorator on every app reload.

Checklist

Check out our PR guidelines for more details.

The following are mandatory for all PRs:

@mamhoff mamhoff requested a review from a team as a code owner November 20, 2024 15:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added the changelog:solidus_legacy_promotions Changes to the solidus_legacy_promotions gem label Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.45%. Comparing base (9013f71) to head (e306a14).
Report is 42 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5946      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.81%   89.45%   +1.64%     
==========================================
  Files         476      782     +306     
  Lines       11656    17997    +6341     
==========================================
+ Hits        10236    16100    +5864     
- Misses       1420     1897     +477     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mamhoff mamhoff force-pushed the correct-decorator-naming branch from c6f6c47 to fe18ce3 Compare November 20, 2024 16:18
@mamhoff mamhoff force-pushed the correct-decorator-naming branch from fe18ce3 to e639857 Compare November 20, 2024 17:14
If we want to use these decorators with Zeitwerk, their naming scheme
has to exchange module name and type. For example,

app/decorators/solidus_legacy_promotions/models/line_item_decorator.rb becomes
app/decorators/models/solidus/legacy_promotions/line_item_decorator.rb

This will eventually allow us to use Zeitwerk for loading decorators.
@mamhoff mamhoff force-pushed the correct-decorator-naming branch from e639857 to e306a14 Compare December 2, 2024 21:17
@tvdeyen tvdeyen merged commit ad84609 into solidusio:main Dec 3, 2024
16 checks passed
@tvdeyen tvdeyen added the backport-v4.4 Backport this pull-request to v4.4 label Dec 3, 2024
@tvdeyen
Copy link
Member

tvdeyen commented Dec 6, 2024

Backport after #6016

@tvdeyen tvdeyen added backport-v4.4 Backport this pull-request to v4.4 and removed backport-v4.4 Backport this pull-request to v4.4 labels Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-v4.4 Backport this pull-request to v4.4 changelog:solidus_legacy_promotions Changes to the solidus_legacy_promotions gem
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants