Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introducing Solidus Guru on Gurubase.io #5914

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kursataktas
Copy link

Hello team,

I'm the maintainer of Anteon. We have created Gurubase.io with the mission of building a centralized, open-source tool-focused knowledge base. Essentially, each "guru" is equipped with custom knowledge to answer user questions based on collected data related to that tool.

I wanted to update you that I've manually added the Solidus Guru to Gurubase. Solidus Guru uses the data from this repo and data from the docs to answer questions by leveraging the LLM.

In this PR, I showcased the "Solidus Guru", which highlights that Solidus now has an AI assistant available to help users with their questions. Please let me know your thoughts on this contribution.

Additionally, if you want me to disable Solidus Guru in Gurubase, just let me know that's totally fine.

@kursataktas kursataktas requested a review from a team as a code owner November 12, 2024 21:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added the changelog:solidus Changes to the solidus meta-gem label Nov 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.54%. Comparing base (b1a3796) to head (da6f62d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5914   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.54%   89.54%           
=======================================
  Files         783      783           
  Lines       17994    17994           
=======================================
  Hits        16113    16113           
  Misses       1881     1881           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jarednorman
Copy link
Member

Hallucinated and generated misinformation when I tried it. I have no issue with it remaining out there for those that seek it out, but I can't justify including a link in our README to something that made up versions of Solidus that don't exist.

@jarednorman
Copy link
Member

Our team further played around with this and found it produced a few useful results, but unfortunately a lot of hallucinations. I personally would not recommend using this tool.

If you can't find answers to your questions about Solidus in our documentation, consider asking in our Slack organization or GitHub Discussions for the project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog:solidus Changes to the solidus meta-gem
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants