Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

chore(deps): update all non-major dev-dependencies #129

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 17, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) ^6.13.2 -> ^6.14.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) ^6.13.2 -> ^6.14.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint (source) ^8.55.0 -> ^8.56.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v6.14.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: add no-unsafe-unary-minus, prefer-destructuring to disable-type-checked (#​8038) (431cd15)
  • eslint-plugin: correct message for no-unsafe-unary-minus (#​7998) (705370a)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: [explicit-function-return-type] add support for typed class property definitions (#​8027) (bff47d7)
  • eslint-plugin: [require-await] allow yielding Promise in async generators (#​8003) (4c3e704)

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.13.2 (2023-12-04)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.13.1 (2023-11-28)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v6.14.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.13.2 (2023-12-04)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.13.1 (2023-11-28)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v8.56.0

Compare Source

Features
  • 0dd9704 feat: Support custom severity when reporting unused disable directives (#​17212) (Bryan Mishkin)
  • 31a7e3f feat: fix no-restricted-properties false negatives with unknown objects (#​17818) (Arka Pratim Chaudhuri)
Bug Fixes
  • 7d5e5f6 fix: TypeError: fs.exists is not a function on read-only file system (#​17846) (Francesco Trotta)
  • 74739c8 fix: suggestion with invalid syntax in no-promise-executor-return rule (#​17812) (Bryan Mishkin)
Documentation
  • 9007719 docs: update link in ways-to-extend.md (#​17839) (Amel SELMANE)
  • 3a22236 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 54c3ca6 docs: fix migration-guide example (#​17829) (Tanuj Kanti)
  • 4391b71 docs: check config comments in rule examples (#​17815) (Francesco Trotta)
  • fd28363 docs: remove mention about ESLint stylistic rules in readme (#​17810) (Zwyx)
  • 48ed5a6 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 12pm on Sunday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@ijsblokjeee ijsblokjeee bot added Dependencies 🚀 PRs and Issues related to dependencies Chore 🧹 labels Dec 17, 2023
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit dca519f into main Dec 17, 2023
6 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the renovate/all-non-major-dev branch December 17, 2023 00:48
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Chore 🧹 Dependencies 🚀 PRs and Issues related to dependencies
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants