Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cache ref data #348

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

fix: cache ref data #348

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

FelixMoelder
Copy link
Contributor

@FelixMoelder FelixMoelder commented Jan 8, 2025

Currently, the cached pangenom gets recreated on every new workflow. This is caused as file nececarry for creating the pangenome where not cached and therefore are downloaded/created on each new execution causing the pangenome to be recreated.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Workflow Optimization
    • Modified output file declarations to be permanent instead of temporary
    • Added caching parameters to improve workflow performance
    • Updated rules related to pangenome haplotype processing and indexing

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the workflow/rules/ref.smk file, focusing on changing output file declarations from temporary to permanent and adding consistent caching parameters across multiple Snakemake rules. These changes affect rules related to pangenome haplotype processing, including get_pangenome_haplotypes, rename_haplotype_contigs, rename_haplotype_chroms, and vg_autoindex.

Changes

File Changes
workflow/rules/ref.smk - Removed temp() from output declarations for multiple rules
- Added cache: "omit-software" to get_pangenome_haplotypes, rename_haplotype_contigs, rename_haplotype_chroms, and vg_autoindex rules

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through the workflow's maze,
Caching rules in snazzy ways,
Temp files gone, permanence here,
Snakemake magic, crystal clear!
A rabbit's guide to data's grace 🧬


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
workflow/rules/ref.smk (1)

Consider updating the vg/autoindex wrapper version

The rule is using wrapper version v5.3.0, but the latest available version in snakemake-wrappers is v0.40.0. Consider updating to benefit from potential improvements and bug fixes.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 201-201: LGTM! The addition of caching will prevent unnecessary recomputation of graph genome indices.

The change correctly enables caching of the vg indices, which are computationally expensive to generate.

Let's verify the wrapper version is the latest:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's a newer version of the vg/autoindex wrapper
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "snakemake", name: "snakemake-wrappers") {
    releases(last: 1) {
      nodes {
        tagName
      }
    }
  }
}' | jq -r '.data.repository.releases.nodes[].tagName'

Length of output: 226


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the wrapper version used in vg_autoindex rule
rg -A 5 "rule vg_autoindex" workflow/rules/ref.smk

Length of output: 219


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the wrapper version used in vg_autoindex rule with more context
rg -A 15 "rule vg_autoindex" workflow/rules/ref.smk

Length of output: 382

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
workflow/rules/ref.smk (2)

184-184: Consider adding the index file to outputs.

The changes correctly enable caching of the renamed VCF file. However, since this is a bgzipped VCF file (output is .vcf.gz), you might want to also include its index file in the outputs to ensure it's cached as well.

     output:
-        "resources/{pangenome}.renamed.vcf.gz",
+        vcf="resources/{pangenome}.renamed.vcf.gz",
+        index="resources/{pangenome}.renamed.vcf.gz.tbi",

Also applies to: 187-187


Line range hint 1-201: Overall: Changes effectively solve the caching issue.

The changes form a complete solution to prevent unnecessary recreation of the pangenome by:

  1. Preserving all intermediate files by removing temp() directives
  2. Consistently applying cache: "omit-software" across all rules
  3. Ensuring the entire pipeline from VCF download to graph index creation is cached

This will significantly improve workflow efficiency by preventing redundant operations.

Consider documenting the caching behavior in the workflow documentation to help users understand:

  • Which files are cached
  • Where they are stored
  • How to clear the cache if needed
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3495239 and 7ebb574.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • workflow/rules/ref.smk (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Quick_Tests
  • GitHub Check: Long_Tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
workflow/rules/ref.smk (2)

167-167: LGTM! The changes correctly enable caching of the contig mapping.

The removal of temp() directive and addition of caching will preserve the contig renaming results, which is appropriate for reference data processing.

Also applies to: 172-172


153-153: LGTM! The changes correctly enable caching of the downloaded pangenome.

The removal of temp() directive and addition of caching will prevent unnecessary downloads of the pangenome VCF file.

Let's verify the URL parameter is properly configured:

Also applies to: 158-158

✅ Verification successful

✓ Verified: Pangenome configuration is properly set up

The pangenome VCF URL is correctly configured to use HPP v1.1 resources, matching the required genome build (GRCh38) and species (homo_sapiens). Caching this file is appropriate.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the pangenome URL is accessible
grep -A 1 'pangenome:' $(find . -name "config.yaml" -o -name "*.json") | grep 'vcf:'

Length of output: 473


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check main config file for pangenome settings
echo "=== Main config file ==="
cat ./config/config.yaml

echo -e "\n=== Searching for pangenome patterns ==="
rg -i "pangenome" -A 3 -B 1 --type yaml

Length of output: 12288

@FelixMoelder FelixMoelder merged commit 0cf0fa8 into master Jan 8, 2025
9 checks passed
@FelixMoelder FelixMoelder deleted the FelixMoelder-patch-1 branch January 8, 2025 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant