-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: refactor URL types and supporting classes #989
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
490c4de
wip: add new URL types and supporting classes
ianbotsf 954ada3
addressing PR feedback: better spacing in toString output; include un…
ianbotsf ff5f6c0
Refactor the util namespace
ianbotsf e56378f
Move new URL classes into runtime.net.url package; clean up API based…
ianbotsf 8460755
Switch to new Url classes and fix compilation errors/tests
ianbotsf 4720935
Remove now-unnecessary text utilities
ianbotsf ea812d0
Lint
ianbotsf c047b08
Add form-url PercentEncoding
ianbotsf 935cb07
Merge branch 'main' into chore-refactor-urls
ianbotsf 1e7a830
Merge branch 'main' into chore-refactor-urls
ianbotsf b25993c
Throw a higher-level exception when URL parsing fails; properly set t…
ianbotsf afc6c26
Fixing bugs with presigning for S3 & Polly
ianbotsf beec5f6
Changes necessary to pass Smithy protocol tests
ianbotsf 0ac6ca3
Update endpoint discovery; add a copy function for Url
ianbotsf 5de290d
addressing PR feedback
ianbotsf 848ed14
new implementation of HTTP label encoding handling
ianbotsf 2df6028
Add changelog
lauzadis bb5d2e4
Bump versions for a breaking change
lauzadis 3ddfe58
Breaking change
lauzadis File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
question/correctness: Why is this splitting on
"
?Also previously we used a dedicated function encodeLabel which adheres to slightly different encoding semantics than HTTP RFC does. I'm not sure this is correct to replace appending (or splitting greedy labels and appending) as it does now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right on both accounts. I've fixed the
"
splitting to be/
as intended. I've fixed part of the label encoding but I still have more changes to make to support query parameters.