Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cert v2 + tun changes for Linux #1224
Cert v2 + tun changes for Linux #1224
Changes from 13 commits
96efc69
9c7e41d
215a586
8bf2f2d
e59be7f
fd96826
2f8ad7c
ef6f5cf
808182c
51f3482
cec1ae8
42a36b4
d6e239c
254fe2a
dabd7a5
61d490e
fe79f6f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They should default to protocol v2, are you seeing something I'm missing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
protocol v2 is working, this is actually a multi-IP issue in a funny hat.
If you have a LH at 10.0.0.1 and you contact it via 10.0.0.2 (who is also fc00:02), because we try to use the IP in the message instead of the hostmap, the LH will never learn the underlay IP for fc00:02, unless you also contact it via overlay-ipv6.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless of course, I have something backwards
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah gotcha. Yeah this and the hostmap don't understand follow on addresses yet. We need a final loop on the updates to point all subsequent addresses to the primary address. I have some of this code staged but its not ready just yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its a great question and I have it in my internals notes as well as ditching the V4AddrPort in v2 protocol stuff.