Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENH] check_estimator utility #90

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023
Merged

[ENH] check_estimator utility #90

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023

Conversation

fkiraly
Copy link
Collaborator

@fkiraly fkiraly commented Sep 12, 2023

This adds a check_estimator utility for checking implemented objects against their type specific contracts.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 57.14% and project coverage change: -0.05% ⚠️

Comparison is base (7f2ce21) 71.36% compared to head (b2930d3) 71.31%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #90      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.36%   71.31%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          90       92       +2     
  Lines        4822     4863      +41     
  Branches      885      893       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         3441     3468      +27     
- Misses       1162     1172      +10     
- Partials      219      223       +4     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
skpro/utils/validation/_dependencies.py 30.76% <16.66%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
skpro/utils/estimator_checks.py 68.57% <68.57%> (ø)
skpro/utils/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fkiraly fkiraly merged commit f1baf8e into main Sep 12, 2023
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants