Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[r/python] R/Python feature-gap analysis (high-level/parent issue) #839

Closed
44 of 52 tasks
maniarathi opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #963
Closed
44 of 52 tasks

[r/python] R/Python feature-gap analysis (high-level/parent issue) #839

maniarathi opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #963

Comments

@maniarathi
Copy link
Contributor

maniarathi commented Jan 31, 2023

Analyze the Python and R tiledbsoma packages to ensure that the APIs are at parity and document any gaps.


@johnkerl johnkerl assigned johnkerl and unassigned johnkerl Feb 3, 2023
@johnkerl johnkerl self-assigned this Feb 13, 2023
@johnkerl johnkerl changed the title Complete a gap analysis between features in R and Python packages Complete a gap analysis between features in R and Python packages (high-level/parent issue) Feb 13, 2023
@johnkerl johnkerl changed the title Complete a gap analysis between features in R and Python packages (high-level/parent issue) [r/python] Complete a gap analysis between features in R and Python packages (high-level/parent issue) Feb 14, 2023
@johnkerl johnkerl changed the title [r/python] Complete a gap analysis between features in R and Python packages (high-level/parent issue) [r/python] R/Python feature-gap analysis (high-level/parent issue) Feb 15, 2023
@johnkerl
Copy link
Member

It looks like a merge of #963 auto-closed this parent task; GH automation overstep 😁

@johnkerl johnkerl reopened this Feb 17, 2023
@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Contributor

My bad. I put the wrong ticket into the PR. Should have been #963, typed #863. Whoops. Get me one of those 'do what I mean not do as I say' computers, please.

@johnkerl
Copy link
Member

Everything here has been split out into separate tracking issues. Closing this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants