Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add dynamodb resource #910

Closed
wants to merge 86 commits into from

Conversation

mikegin
Copy link
Contributor

@mikegin mikegin commented May 12, 2023

DynamoDB auto connection

Auto connection to the first Key Value store on Shuttle 🥳🚀

Big shoutout to @paulotten for taking the lead on this task

@paulotten
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #895

@mikegin mikegin force-pushed the feature/dynamodb-resource branch from 19a3239 to 6a9cac4 Compare May 15, 2023 17:27
@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu added the L label May 16, 2023
Only the "cloud" version of the provisioner needs to delete tables if the dynamodb resource is deleted.
@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2023
@iulianbarbu
Copy link
Contributor

@mikegin @paulotten FYI, I synced this branch with main and fixed the tests.

Copy link
Contributor

@chesedo chesedo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@iulianbarbu I left two comments. This seems about ready, thanks!

service/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cargo-shuttle/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @chesedo ! Resolved the comments.

cargo-shuttle/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
service/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@oddgrd oddgrd added the S-Blocked Implementing this is currently blocked by other issues and/or upstream dependencies label Sep 4, 2023
@oddgrd
Copy link
Contributor

oddgrd commented Sep 4, 2023

Hey @mikegin and @paulotten, we're going to close this as blocked until we can figure out how we will securily provision this resource. Thanks for all your hard work on this, we're sorry we couldn't get this over the line, it looked really great, and we'll likely return to your implementation in the future when we decide on the design. This PR also made it very clear which problem we need to solve next, so thanks for that too!

@oddgrd oddgrd closed this Sep 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-Blocked Implementing this is currently blocked by other issues and/or upstream dependencies
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants