Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Test for entities #9

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Feat: Test for entities #9

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

malik672
Copy link
Collaborator

@malik672 malik672 commented Aug 25, 2024

this test is for entities

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced new test cases for the Trade module, enhancing validation of trading scenarios involving Ether and other tokens.
    • Added tests for trade construction, ensuring accuracy of input/output currency handling and edge case management.
    • Validated methods for finding the best trading routes, confirming functionality under various liquidity conditions.
    • Ensured reliable output for maximum amount in, minimum amount out, and worst execution price methods through comprehensive testing.
    • Created a dedicated testing module for improved organization and modularity of entity-related tests.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent modifications involve the addition of numerous test cases for the Trade module in the src/entities/trade.rs file. These tests validate various trading scenarios, particularly concerning Ether and token interactions. The changes focus on ensuring the correct handling of input and output currencies, testing methods such as Trade::new, best_trade_exact_in, and best_trade_exact_out, while addressing edge cases and error handling without altering any function signatures. Fascinating, isn't it?

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/entities/trade.rs Added extensive test cases for trading functionalities, validating input/output handling, error conditions, and scenarios involving Ether, without modifying existing function signatures.
src/entities/entities_test.rs Introduced a new file containing unit tests for Pair, Route, and Trade, validating essential functionality and properties.
src/entities/mod.rs Added a new module declaration for entities_test, enhancing the organization of test cases related to entities.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Trade
    participant Currency

    User->>Trade: Initiates trade with Ether
    Trade->>Currency: Validates input currency
    Currency-->>Trade: Returns validation result
    Trade->>User: Returns trade details
Loading

Poem

In the realm of Ether's embrace,
New tests emerged, a brisk pace.
Edge cases abound,
Precision profound,
In trade's dance, we find our place!
🎉💰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@malik672 malik672 marked this pull request as draft August 25, 2024 15:54
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range comments (2)
src/entities/trade.rs (2)

Line range hint 60-125: Robust implementation of trade construction, but consider enhancing documentation.

The function handles trade initialization comprehensively. However, given the complexity, adding more detailed inline comments would aid in maintainability and clarity, especially for new developers or auditors.


Line range hint 144-210: Important functions for managing trade slippage, well implemented.

The slippage management functions are crucial for user protection in volatile trading environments. Consider adding more detailed comments to explain the calculations and their importance in risk management.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfc6e17 and e9d7c81.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/entities/trade.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
src/entities/trade.rs (6)

Line range hint 9-21: Well done on the comparator function!

The use of assertions to ensure comparability is a wise choice, ensuring that only valid trades are compared, thus preventing potential runtime errors during sorting operations.


Line range hint 23-37: Excellent extension of the basic comparator!

Incorporating additional trade dimensions such as price impact and number of hops is crucial for accurately ranking trades, especially in a gas-sensitive environment like Ethereum.


Line range hint 39-44: Struct design for trade options is appropriate.

Using optional parameters for maximum results and hops provides necessary flexibility in trade route calculations, accommodating various user needs and scenarios.


Line range hint 46-58: Comprehensive design of the Trade struct.

The struct effectively encapsulates all relevant aspects of a trade, from routing to execution details, which is crucial for the robustness of trading operations.


Line range hint 127-142: Good use of convenience functions for trade creation.

The exact_in and exact_out functions provide clear, focused entry points for creating trades, enhancing the API's usability and readability.


Line range hint 212-1096: Core trading functions implemented with necessary complexity.

The recursive nature of best_trade_exact_in and best_trade_exact_out is well-suited to exploring trade routes. Given the complexity and potential impact on performance, recommend stress testing these functions with various real-world scenarios to ensure robustness.

Consider adding automated stress tests to validate these functions under high load and with complex trade networks.

@malik672 malik672 requested a review from shuhuiluo August 25, 2024 16:02
@malik672 malik672 marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2024 16:02
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9d7c81 and c98a30a.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/entities/entities_test.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/entities/mod.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
src/entities/mod.rs (3)

1-1: Excellent addition of the entities_test module.

This modular approach not only enhances testability but also adheres to Rust's idiomatic use of modularity.


2-4: Module declarations are consistent and correct.

Re-declaring pair, route, and trade without changes ensures stability in the module's structure.


Line range hint 6-8: Public exports are appropriately managed.

The use of pub use for Pair, Route, and trade::* is a clear and effective way to expose these entities.

src/entities/entities_test.rs (1)

1-346: Thorough and well-structured test suite.

The use of #[cfg(test)] and modular test declarations are spot-on for Rust. The tests are comprehensive, covering a wide range of scenarios and using static and dynamic data effectively.

}

#[test]
fn test_entities() {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't you use modules and functions to scope unit tests? How is this a unit test?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants