-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes by create-pull-request action #34
Conversation
审核者指南 by Sourcery此 PR 包含 SonarQube API 客户端代码中的文档更新。更改重新排序了文档注释中禁止的指标和支持的指标列表,保持相同的内容但顺序不同。 未生成图表,因为更改看起来简单且不需要视觉表示。 文件级更改
提示和命令与 Sourcery 互动
自定义您的体验访问您的仪表板以:
获取帮助Original review guide in EnglishReviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR contains minor documentation updates in the SonarQube API client code. The changes reorder the list of forbidden metrics and supported metrics in the documentation comments, maintaining the same content but in a different sequence. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
嗨 @shijl0925 - 我已经审查了你的更改 - 这里有一些反馈:
总体评论:
- 这些自动重新排序的目的是什么?这些更改似乎纯粹是表面上的,没有遵循任何明确的模式(不是按字母顺序或其他方式)。请澄清运行此自动操作的动机。
这是我在审查期间查看的内容
- 🟢 一般问题:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 安全性:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 测试:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 复杂性:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 文档:一切看起来都很好
帮助我变得更有用!请在每条评论上点击 👍 或 👎,我将使用反馈来改进你的评论。
Original comment in English
Hey @shijl0925 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- What is the purpose of these automated reorderings? The changes appear to be purely cosmetic without following any clear pattern (not alphabetical or otherwise). Please clarify the motivation behind running this automated action.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
437891b
to
3df71fc
Compare
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action