Changes by create-pull-request action

[shijl0925]

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

[sourcery-ai]

审核者指南由 Sourcery 提供

此 PR 包含自动更改，重新排序了文档注释中的列表。更改仅为外观上的，不影响代码的功能。

未生成图表，因为更改看起来简单，不需要视觉表示。

文件级更改

更改	详情	文件
重新排序了文档注释中的禁止指标列表	将禁止指标列表中的项目从 'alert_status, security_hotspots, new_security_hotspots' 重新排序为 'new_security_hotspots, security_hotspots, alert_status' 更改仅为外观上的，并保持相同的禁止指标集	sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go
重新排序了文档注释中的支持指标列表	重新排序了类型为 DATA 的支持指标列表中的项目 从 'security_issues, maintainability_issues, ...' 更改为 'new_reliability_issues, new_security_issues, ...' 更改仅为外观上的，并保持相同的支持指标集	sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go

---

提示和命令

与 Sourcery 互动

• 触发新审核： 在拉取请求上评论 @sourcery-ai review。
• 继续讨论： 直接回复 Sourcery 的审核评论。
• 从审核评论生成 GitHub 问题： 通过回复审核评论请求 Sourcery 创建一个问题。
• 生成拉取请求标题： 在拉取请求标题的任何地方写 @sourcery-ai 以随时生成标题。
• 生成拉取请求摘要： 在拉取请求正文的任何地方写 @sourcery-ai summary 以随时生成 PR 摘要。您也可以使用此命令指定摘要应插入的位置。

自定义您的体验

访问您的仪表板以：

• 启用或禁用审核功能，例如 Sourcery 生成的拉取请求摘要、审核者指南等。
• 更改审核语言。
• 添加、删除或编辑自定义审核说明。
• 调整其他审核设置。

获取帮助

• 如有问题或反馈，请联系我们的支持团队。
• 访问我们的文档以获取详细指南和信息。
• 通过关注我们在 X/Twitter、LinkedIn 或 GitHub 上的 Sourcery 团队保持联系。

Original review guide in English

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR contains automated changes that reorder lists within documentation comments. The changes are purely cosmetic and do not affect the functionality of the code.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Reordered forbidden metrics list in documentation comments	Reordered items in the list of forbidden metrics from 'alert_status, security_hotspots, new_security_hotspots' to 'new_security_hotspots, security_hotspots, alert_status' The change is purely cosmetic and maintains the same set of forbidden metrics	sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go
Reordered supported metrics list in documentation comments	Reordered items in the list of supported metrics for type DATA Changed from 'security_issues, maintainability_issues, ...' to 'new_reliability_issues, new_security_issues, ...' The change is purely cosmetic and maintains the same set of supported metrics	sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 903286e..72bff4a. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Go	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[sourcery-ai]

嗨 @shijl0925 - 我已经审查了你的更改 - 这里有一些反馈：

总体评论：

• 考虑配置 create-pull-request 操作以跳过纯粹的外观更改，比如重新排列文档列表中的项目，因为这些更改没有太大价值，并且可能在 git 历史中产生不必要的噪音。

这是我在审查期间查看的内容

• 🟢 一般问题：一切看起来都很好
• 🟢 安全性：一切看起来都很好
• 🟢 测试：一切看起来都很好
• 🟢 复杂性：一切看起来都很好
• 🟢 文档：一切看起来都很好

---

Sourcery 对开源项目免费 - 如果你喜欢我们的评论，请考虑分享它们 ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{帮助我变得更有用！请点击每条评论上的 👍 或 👎，我将使用反馈来改进你的评论。}

Original comment in English

Hey @shijl0925 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider configuring the create-pull-request action to skip purely cosmetic changes like reordering items in documentation lists, as these don't provide much value and can create unnecessary noise in the git history.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud