Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes by create-pull-request action #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

shijl0925
Copy link
Owner

@shijl0925 shijl0925 commented Aug 28, 2024

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the comments and documentation for specific fields in two Go files related to SonarQube measures and quality gates. The MetricKeys field in ComponentTreeRequest has revised comments reflecting a new order of metrics, while the Metric fields in CreateConditionRequest and UpdateConditionRequest have expanded lists of forbidden metrics. These modifications aim to enhance clarity without altering the underlying functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go Updated comments for the MetricKeys field in ComponentTreeRequest to reflect a new ordering of metrics.
sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go Expanded the list of forbidden metrics in the Metric fields of CreateConditionRequest and UpdateConditionRequest.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant API
    participant Metrics

    Developer->>API: Request for ComponentTree
    API->>Metrics: Fetch MetricKeys
    Metrics-->>API: Return MetricKeys (ordered)
    API-->>Developer: Response with MetricKeys

    Developer->>API: Create Quality Gate Condition
    API->>Metrics: Validate Metric
    Metrics-->>API: Return validation result
    API-->>Developer: Response with condition status
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the garden where metrics bloom,
The order shifts, dispelling gloom.
With clarity now, the gates stand tall,
Forbidden metrics, we heed the call.
Hopping through code, we celebrate,
A new dawn for quality, oh, how great! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 812a5ea and 0ee8470.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go (1 hunks)
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go
Additional comments not posted (2)
sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go (2)

40-40: LGTM!

The updated list of forbidden metrics enhances clarity and specificity.

The code changes are approved.


284-284: LGTM!

The updated list of forbidden metrics enhances clarity and specificity.

The code changes are approved.

@shijl0925 shijl0925 force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch from 0ee8470 to 3164dd0 Compare August 29, 2024 02:37
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ee8470 and 3164dd0.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go (1 hunks)
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go

@shijl0925 shijl0925 force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch from 3164dd0 to f17bee8 Compare August 30, 2024 02:38
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3164dd0 and f17bee8.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go (1 hunks)
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go

@shijl0925 shijl0925 force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch from f17bee8 to d21cb32 Compare August 31, 2024 02:37
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f17bee8 and d21cb32.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go (1 hunks)
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go

@shijl0925 shijl0925 force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch from d21cb32 to 9c63f5a Compare September 2, 2024 02:41
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d21cb32 and 9c63f5a.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go (1 hunks)
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • sonarqube/measures/measures_gen.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • sonarqube/qualitygates/qualitygates_gen.go

@shijl0925 shijl0925 force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch 7 times, most recently from 1f24d52 to abd2050 Compare September 9, 2024 02:43
@shijl0925 shijl0925 force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch 8 times, most recently from 9a0cd3a to 052cc99 Compare September 17, 2024 02:21
@shijl0925 shijl0925 force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch from 052cc99 to 84fc78b Compare September 18, 2024 02:40
@shijl0925 shijl0925 force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch from 84fc78b to 22ff38c Compare September 19, 2024 02:42
Copy link

@shijl0925 shijl0925 merged commit 965237b into master Sep 19, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant