Editing

docs/cdev-vs-hemlfile.md

@@ -1,63 +1,63 @@
-# **Cluster.dev vs. Helmfile: Managing Kubernetes Helm Charts**
+# Cluster.dev vs. Helmfile: Managing Kubernetes Helm Charts
 
 Kubernetes, with its dynamic and versatile nature, requires efficient tools to manage its deployments. Two tools that have gained significant attention for this purpose are Cluster.dev and Helmfile. Both are designed to manage Kubernetes Helm charts but with varying focuses and features. This article offers a comparative analysis of Cluster.dev and Helmfile, spotlighting their respective strengths.
 
-## **1. Introduction**
+## 1. Introduction
 
-- **Cluster.dev**:
+- Cluster.dev:
   - A versatile tool designed for managing cloud-native infrastructures with declarative manifests, known as stack templates.
   - Integrates with various technologies, including Terraform modules, Kubernetes manifests, Helm charts, and more.
   - Promotes a unified approach to deploying, testing, and distributing infrastructure components.
 
-- **Helmfile**:
+- Helmfile:
   - A declarative specification for deploying and synchronizing Helm charts.
   - Provides automation and workflow tooling around the Helm tool, making it easier to deploy and manage Helm charts across several clusters or environments.
 
-## **2. Core Features & Abilities**
+## 2. Core Features & Abilities
 
-- **Declarative Manifests**:
+- Declarative Manifests:
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Uses stack templates, allowing integration with various technologies. This versatility makes Cluster.dev suitable for describing and deploying an entire infrastructure.
+  - Cluster.dev: Uses stack templates, allowing integration with various technologies. This versatility makes Cluster.dev suitable for describing and deploying an entire infrastructure.
 
-  - **Helmfile**: Uses a specific declarative structure for Helm charts. Helmfile's `helmfile.yaml` describes the desired state of Helm releases, promoting consistent deployments across environments.
+  - Helmfile: Uses a specific declarative structure for Helm charts. Helmfile's `helmfile.yaml` describes the desired state of Helm releases, promoting consistent deployments across environments.
 
-- **Integration and Flexibility**:
+- Integration and Flexibility:
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Supports a wide array of technologies beyond Helm, such as Terraform and Kubernetes manifests. This broad scope makes it suitable for diverse cloud-native projects.
+  - Cluster.dev: Supports a wide array of technologies beyond Helm, such as Terraform and Kubernetes manifests. This broad scope makes it suitable for diverse cloud-native projects.
 
-  - **Helmfile**: Exclusively focuses on Helm, providing tailored utilities, commands, and functions that enhance the Helm experience.
+  - Helmfile: Exclusively focuses on Helm, providing tailored utilities, commands, and functions that enhance the Helm experience.
 
-- **Configuration Management**:
+- Configuration Management:
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Uses stack templates to handle configurations, integrating them with the respective technology modules. For Helm, it provides a dedicated "helm" unit type.
+  - Cluster.dev: Uses stack templates to handle configurations, integrating them with the respective technology modules. For Helm, it provides a dedicated "helm" unit type.
 
-  - **Helmfile**: Employs `helmfile.yaml`, where users can specify Helm chart details, dependencies, repositories, and values. Helmfile also supports templating and layering of values, providing powerful configuration management.
+  - Helmfile: Employs `helmfile.yaml`, where users can specify Helm chart details, dependencies, repositories, and values. Helmfile also supports templating and layering of values, providing powerful configuration management.
 
-- **Workflow and Automation**:
+- Workflow and Automation:
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Offers a GitOps Development experience across different technologies, ensuring consistent deployment practices.
+  - Cluster.dev: Offers a GitOps Development experience across different technologies, ensuring consistent deployment practices.
 
-  - **Helmfile**: Provides a suite of commands (`apply`, `sync`, `diff`, etc.) tailored for Helm workflows, making it easy to manage Helm releases in an automated manner.
+  - Helmfile: Provides a suite of commands (`apply`, `sync`, `diff`, etc.) tailored for Helm workflows, making it easy to manage Helm releases in an automated manner.
 
-- **Values and Templating**:
+- Values and Templating:
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Supports values templating for Helm units, and offers functions like `remoteState` and `insertYAML` for dynamic inputs.
+  - Cluster.dev: Supports values templating for Helm units, and offers functions like `remoteState` and `insertYAML` for dynamic inputs.
 
-  - **Helmfile**: Robustly supports values templating, with features like environment-specific value files and Go templating. It allows for dynamic generation of values based on the environment or external commands.
+  - Helmfile: Robustly supports values templating, with features like environment-specific value files and Go templating. It allows for dynamic generation of values based on the environment or external commands.
 
-## **3. Ideal Use Cases**
+## 3. Ideal Use Cases
 
-- **Cluster.dev**:
+- Cluster.dev:
   - Large-scale cloud-native projects integrating various technologies.
   - Unified deployment and management of multi-technology stacks.
   - Organizations aiming for a consistent GitOps approach across their stack.
 
-- **Helmfile**:
+- Helmfile:
   - Projects heavily reliant on Helm for deployments.
   - Organizations needing advanced configuration management for Helm charts.
   - Scenarios requiring repetitive and consistent Helm chart deployments across various clusters or environments.
 
-## **4. Conclusion**
+## 4. Conclusion
 
 Cluster.dev and Helmfile, while both capable of managing Helm charts, cater to different spectrums of the Kubernetes deployment landscape. Cluster.dev aims for a holistic approach to cloud-native infrastructure management, integrating various technologies. Helmfile, on the other hand, delves deep into Helm's ecosystem, offering advanced tooling for Helm chart management.
 

docs/cdev-vs-terragrunt.md

@@ -2,58 +2,58 @@
 
 Both Cluster.dev and Terragrunt have been increasingly popular tools within the DevOps community, particularly among those working with Terraform. However, each tool brings its unique offerings to the table. This article dives deep into a comparison of these tools to provide a clear understanding of their capabilities and respective strengths.
 
-### **1. Introduction**
+### 1. Introduction
 
-- **Cluster.dev**
+- Cluster.dev
   - A comprehensive tool designed for managing cloud-native infrastructures using declarative manifests called stack templates.
   - Integrates with various components such as Terraform modules, Kubernetes manifests, Shell scripts, Helm charts, Argo CD/Flux applications, and OPA policies.
   - Provides a unified approach to deploy, test, and distribute components.
 
-- **Terragrunt**
+- Terragrunt
   - An extension for Terraform designed to provide additional utilities to manage Terraform modules.
   - Helps in keeping Terraform configurations DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself), ensuring modularity and reuse across multiple environments.
   - Offers a layered approach to configuration, simplifying the management of Terraform deployments.
 
-### **2. Core Features & Abilities**
+### 2. Core Features & Abilities
 
-- **Configuration Management**
+- Configuration Management
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Uses stack templates for configuration. Templates can integrate with various technologies like Terraform, Kubernetes, and Helm. A single template can describe and deploy an entire infrastructure.
-  - **Terragrunt**: Primarily deals with Terraform configurations. Enables reuse and modularity of configurations by linking to Terraform modules and managing inputs/outputs between them.
+  - Cluster.dev: Uses stack templates for configuration. Templates can integrate with various technologies like Terraform, Kubernetes, and Helm. A single template can describe and deploy an entire infrastructure.
+  - Terragrunt: Primarily deals with Terraform configurations. Enables reuse and modularity of configurations by linking to Terraform modules and managing inputs/outputs between them.
 
-- **Flexibility & Integration**
+- Flexibility & Integration
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Highly flexible, supporting a multitude of components from Terraform modules to Kubernetes manifests. Its design promotes integrating diverse cloud-native technologies.
-  - **Terragrunt**: Primarily focuses on Terraform. While it offers great utility functions for Terraform, its integration capabilities are confined to Terraform's ecosystem.
+  - Cluster.dev: Highly flexible, supporting a multitude of components from Terraform modules to Kubernetes manifests. Its design promotes integrating diverse cloud-native technologies.
+  - Terragrunt: Primarily focuses on Terraform. While it offers great utility functions for Terraform, its integration capabilities are confined to Terraform's ecosystem.
 
-- **Workflow Management**
+- Workflow Management
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Aims for a consistent GitOps Development experience across multiple technologies.
-  - **Terragrunt**: Facilitates workflows within Terraform, such as ensuring consistent remote state management and modular Terraform deployments.
+  - Cluster.dev: Aims for a consistent GitOps Development experience across multiple technologies.
+  - Terragrunt: Facilitates workflows within Terraform, such as ensuring consistent remote state management and modular Terraform deployments.
 
-- **Versioning & Source Management**
+- Versioning & Source Management
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Allows pinning versions for components and supports specifying module versions directly within the stack templates.
-  - **Terragrunt**: Uses a version reference for Terraform modules, making it easier to manage and switch between different versions of modules.
+  - Cluster.dev: Allows pinning versions for components and supports specifying module versions directly within the stack templates.
+  - Terragrunt: Uses a version reference for Terraform modules, making it easier to manage and switch between different versions of modules.
 
-- **Special Features**
+- Special Features
 
-  - **Cluster.dev**: Provides templating for different technologies, can be used in any cloud or on-premises scenarios, and promotes technology best practices.
-  - **Terragrunt**: Provides utilities like automatic retries, locking, and helper scripts for advanced scenarios in Terraform.
+  - Cluster.dev: Provides templating for different technologies, can be used in any cloud or on-premises scenarios, and promotes technology best practices.
+  - Terragrunt: Provides utilities like automatic retries, locking, and helper scripts for advanced scenarios in Terraform.
 
-### **3. When to Use Which?**
+### 3. When to Use Which?
 
-- **Cluster.dev** is ideal for:
+- Cluster.dev is ideal for:
   - Managing infrastructures that integrate multiple cloud-native technologies.
   - Projects that need unified deployment, testing, and distribution.
   - Environments that require a consistent GitOps development experience across technologies.
 
-- **Terragrunt** shines when:
+- Terragrunt shines when:
   - You're working exclusively or primarily with Terraform.
   - Needing to maintain configurations DRY and modular across multiple environments.
   - Complex Terraform projects that require additional utilities like locking, retries, and advanced configuration management.
 
-### **4. Conclusion**
+### 4. Conclusion
 
 While both Cluster.dev and Terragrunt cater to infrastructure as code and Terraform enthusiasts, their ideal use cases differ. Cluster.dev provides a more holistic approach to cloud-native infrastructure management, incorporating a range of technologies. In contrast, Terragrunt focuses on enhancing the Terraform experience.