Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implements incremental analysis experiment #577

Draft
wants to merge 95 commits into
base: vara-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vulder
Copy link
Contributor

@vulder vulder commented Dec 22, 2021

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2021

Codecov Report

Base: 66.97% // Head: 66.34% // Decreases project coverage by -0.62% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (dc98e18) compared to base (46e59a2).
Patch coverage: 62.40% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head dc98e18 differs from pull request most recent head a28b008. Consider uploading reports for the commit a28b008 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           vara-dev     #577      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     66.97%   66.34%   -0.63%     
============================================
  Files           291      261      -30     
  Lines         22301    19126    -3175     
============================================
- Hits          14936    12690    -2246     
+ Misses         7365     6436     -929     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
tests/utils/test_bb_config.py 97.36% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
tests/utils/test_git_util.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
varats-core/varats/project/varats_project.py 92.85% <ø> (ø)
varats/varats/data/reports/__init__.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
varats/varats/projects/c_projects/gravity.py 52.94% <0.00%> (+1.01%) ⬆️
varats/varats/projects/c_projects/lrzip.py 61.53% <0.00%> (ø)
varats/varats/table/table.py 70.14% <0.00%> (-6.24%) ⬇️
varats-core/varats/experiment/wllvm.py 51.02% <25.00%> (-1.73%) ⬇️
varats/varats/tables/incremental_eval.py 28.81% <28.81%> (ø)
...ats/varats/experiments/vara/feature_perf_runner.py 40.74% <40.74%> (+3.00%) ⬆️
... and 158 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@vulder vulder requested a review from pdschubert January 21, 2022 14:34
From now on, users can specify a datetime instead of of a commit hash to
select a range of commits.

vara-cs gen -p xz select_sample --start 2021-08-08 --end 2022-1-1
From now on, users can specify a datetime instead of of a commit hash to
select a range of commits.

vara-cs gen -p xz select_sample --start 2021-08-08 --end 2022-1-1
In cases where the start timestamp is before the initial commit, we
should select the initial commit.
In cases where the start timestamp is before the initial commit, we
should select the initial commit.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants