Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cognee integration #17314

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

dexters1
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Integration of the cognee GraphRAG to LlamaIndex.
With added tests, README.md and usage example in README.md

Fixes # (issue)

New Package?

Did I fill in the tool.llamahub section in the pyproject.toml and provide a detailed README.md for my new integration or package?

  • Yes
  • No

Version Bump?

Did I bump the version in the pyproject.toml file of the package I am updating? (Except for the llama-index-core package)

  • Yes
  • No

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Your pull-request will likely not be merged unless it is covered by some form of impactful unit testing.

  • I added new unit tests to cover this change
  • I believe this change is already covered by existing unit tests

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added Google Colab support for the newly added notebooks.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I ran make format; make lint to appease the lint gods

dexters1 and others added 7 commits December 16, 2024 18:13
Proposal for integration of cognee to llama-index
Resolve issue of propagating llm key to cognee in test

fix
Added more descriptions to cognee GraphRAG

Refactor
Added lint and formatting changes

Docs
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need to commit the lock file

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed lock file

graph_db_provider,
vector_db_provider,
relational_db_provider,
db_name,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of these args are typed

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added typing

)
cognee.config.system_root_directory(cognee_directory_path)

async def add(self, data, dataset_name: str):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add return type annotations, even its its -> None ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it's added

from .base import GraphRAG


class CogneeGraphRAG(GraphRAG):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe a docstring is needed here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added

from llama_index.graph_rag.cognee import CogneeGraphRAG


async def test_graph_rag_cognee():
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These tests will not run in CICD. We probably need to

  • mark this as skip if the appropriate API keys are missing
  • maybe write tests that mock network calls? Up to you

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added marking as skipped if API key is missing

@logan-markewich logan-markewich self-assigned this Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants