Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add async version of retry_on_exceptions_with_backoff utility #16374

Conversation

vignesh14052002
Copy link
Contributor

Description

I am working on an application that makes a lot of concurrent calls and hit ratelimit frequently, the retry_on_exceptions_with_backoff utility is useful but our functions are async, so added another utility for async functions

I have also added a decorator for ease of use

New Package?

Did I fill in the tool.llamahub section in the pyproject.toml and provide a detailed README.md for my new integration or package?

  • Yes
  • No

Version Bump?

Did I bump the version in the pyproject.toml file of the package I am updating? (Except for the llama-index-core package)

  • Yes
  • No

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Your pull-request will likely not be merged unless it is covered by some form of impactful unit testing.

  • I added new unit tests to cover this change
  • I believe this change is already covered by existing unit tests

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added Google Colab support for the newly added notebooks.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I ran make format; make lint to appease the lint gods

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 5, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Oct 7, 2024
@logan-markewich logan-markewich self-assigned this Oct 7, 2024
@logan-markewich logan-markewich enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2024 22:23
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2024 04:50

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@vignesh14052002
Copy link
Contributor Author

vignesh14052002 commented Oct 11, 2024

@logan-markewich can you approve the workflows, it is not running for the past 2 days

@logan-markewich logan-markewich merged commit e892b34 into run-llama:main Oct 15, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants