-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 861
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: mcontrol/mcontrol6 on fetch #1459
Open
YenHaoChen
wants to merge
4
commits into
riscv-software-src:master
Choose a base branch
from
YenHaoChen:pr-mcontrol-execute
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0578364
triggers: fix data mcontrol/mcontrol6 on fetching instruction data
YenHaoChen 146e41e
triggers: fix address mcontrol/mcontrol6 on fetching PC
YenHaoChen 0d8067b
triggers: refactor: move access_info to where it is used in mmu_t::tr…
YenHaoChen 661c6a2
triggers: performance improvement on execute mcontrol/mcontrol6
YenHaoChen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this will spuriously invoke
check_triggers
on ITLB misses. Note that fetches from MMIO devices accesses always result in ITLB misses, so this meanscheck_triggers
will be invoked on every MMIO fetch. Maybe this is functionally correct and is only a perf issue, but it seems undesirable.What's wrong with my original suggestion of moving this check back into
fetch_slow_path
? By construction, we should not need to check the triggers on the fetch fast path...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current implementation splits instruction fetching into multiple 2-byte operations, which call
fetch_slow_path
separately. This results in that a 4-byte instruction 0xe9830313 matches data triggers with tdata2={0xe983, 0x0313} instead of one with tdata2=0xe9830313 incorrectly. Additionally, a 4-byte instruction with PC at 0x4000 matches address triggers with tdata2={0x4000, 0x4002}, which is unexpected from a user perspective.The behavior of the data trigger in the current implementation does not conform to the specification. It is weird to me that the address trigger matches PCs of 2-byte granularity. Clarify whether the specification allows the address trigger to match an arbitrary subset of the accessing addresses: riscv/riscv-debug-spec#877.
Update 2023.09.20:
The riscv/riscv-debug-spec#877 clarifies that the specification allows the address trigger to match an arbitrary subset of the accessing addresses. Thus, the specification allows the original behavior of the address trigger. Possibly, we can improve performance by keeping address trigger checking in
fetch_slow_path
. However, the data trigger truly does not work infetch_slow_path
. Moving address triggers out fromfetch_slow_path
also provides a more reasonable behavior from a user perspective.@aswaterman How do you feel about this?