Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(module): improve param validation #43

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2024

Conversation

saiintbrisson
Copy link

This commit changes how we validate module params, making it impossible to create invalid addresses, names, or repeated names when updating an existing module. The checks are now in one place.

@saiintbrisson saiintbrisson force-pushed the feat/improve-module-param-validation branch from d36b49e to 7da41fc Compare March 24, 2024 17:05
@saiintbrisson saiintbrisson force-pushed the feat/improve-module-param-validation branch 2 times, most recently from b411643 to 78872cc Compare March 24, 2024 17:44
Copy link
Member

@aripiprazole aripiprazole left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

theres still some clippy errors

This commit changes how we validate module params, making it impossible
to create invalid addresses, names, or repeated names when updating an
existing module. The checks are now in one place.
@saiintbrisson saiintbrisson force-pushed the feat/improve-module-param-validation branch from 78872cc to a89bd83 Compare March 24, 2024 17:56
@saiintbrisson saiintbrisson merged commit 9cd78ad into main Mar 24, 2024
1 check passed
@saiintbrisson saiintbrisson deleted the feat/improve-module-param-validation branch June 13, 2024 06:53
functor-flow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
This commit changes how we validate module params, making it impossible
to create invalid addresses, names, or repeated names when updating an
existing module. The checks are now in one place.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants