Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

common: Update RPM_ARCHES to match dnf #178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

andreabolognani
Copy link
Contributor

Since the list was last updated in 2015, rpm has learned about a few additional architectures.

Specifically, the following architectures are added:

armv5tl, armv8hl, armv8l,
loongarch64,
mips, mips64, mips64el, mipsel,
riscv128, riscv32, riscv64,

Of those, riscv64 and loongarch64 are particularly relevant to upcoming and in progress Fedora ports.

Since the list was last updated in 2015, rpm has learned about
a few additional architectures.

Specifically, the following architectures are added:

  armv5tl, armv8hl, armv8l,
  loongarch64,
  mips, mips64, mips64el, mipsel,
  riscv128, riscv32, riscv64,

Of those, riscv64 and loongarch64 are particularly relevant to
upcoming and in progress Fedora ports.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <[email protected]>
@lubomir
Copy link
Contributor

lubomir commented Nov 4, 2024

Thank you. I can confirm that the list matches what DNF has. It would be nice to reuse the definition, but the cost of depending on DNF is too high, given that it can not be installed from PyPI.

@lubomir lubomir merged commit af700fe into release-engineering:master Nov 4, 2024
6 checks passed
@andreabolognani andreabolognani deleted the rpm-arches branch November 4, 2024 14:18
@andreabolognani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot for the very quick review!

@andreabolognani
Copy link
Contributor Author

andreabolognani commented Nov 4, 2024

@lubomir are you planning to tag an upstream release and import into Fedora in the short term?

For context, I'm working on reducing the number of out-of-tree patches that are needed to build Fedora on riscv64, so in order to get this package off my list I need the change to land in Fedora 41. I can backport it as a patch on top of the latest Fedora package, wait for an upstream release, leave it all up to you... Just let me know what your preference is and I'll happily go along with it :)

@andreabolognani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Amazing, thank you!

@andreabolognani
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lubomir both updates have now collected enough karma to be pushed to stable. I'd appreciate if you could do that when you have a moment, then I'll stop pestering you O:-) Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants