-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Establish protocol for replacing mentors/coordinators who leave during the semester #55
Comments
This issue was duplicated in #59 - I'll close that issue to keep this discussion isolated here |
I just noticed some circular logic in our draft policy: Under "Mid-semester":
Under "First Month" (above "mid-semester"):
We should add something along the lines of "If after one week of following the procedure above, there is no waitlist and we have no new applicants, we will not appoint any new mentors unless the mentor shortage results in 1 mentor in a small group", similar to something we put in the "final month" section. We may need to change "1 mentor" to "2 or fewer mentors" in both cases, depending on how big the small group in question is. |
We should also discuss new mentor training for emergency appointments. Unless a large number of mentors leave at once, a one-on-one debrief/training session with a coordinator could potentially replace the mentor training requirement for any mentors appointed after the last mentor training session of the semester has taken place. The same policy could be applied to anyone who has a documented reason to have missed all mentor training sessions. |
Description of Issue:
Currently, we have no protocol in place for when mentors/coordinators leave during the semester.
Proposed Solution:
Create a policy outlining what to do and whether to replace the mentor/coordinator leaving or to move a mentor from one small group to another. This policy may be dependent on:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: