Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix false positives for extractions in lambdas #2233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #2231

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2233 (cdaf327) into main (b49ee9d) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head cdaf327 differs from pull request most recent head 1698e8f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1698e8f to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2233   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.65%   99.65%           
=======================================
  Files         114      114           
  Lines        5175     5176    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         5157     5158    +1     
  Misses         18       18           
Files Coverage Δ
R/unnecessary_lambda_linter.R 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico merged commit 6e4dbec into main Oct 8, 2023
20 checks passed
@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico deleted the lambda-extract branch October 8, 2023 20:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

unnecessary_lambda_linter() gets confused by indexing in lambda function
3 participants