You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The costs were associated with the heat assets, but they were assigned to a stakeholder with no name. Let us know if you see this happen again and we'll look into it further.
This interesting thing is that the scenario the LES was exported from doesn't have a heat network. So no costs at all should be assigned to heat source nor to heat assets.
The heat source lists gives units 0 for all plant types, but also gives 1 km distance. I think that is a standard setting.
Possible solution
Set both units and distance in heat source to 0 for scenarios without a heat network.
Screen shots
Heat source list
Heat asset list
Heat assets
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I had the same problem. The cetrnal heatnetwork got 1 unit (although capacity o) and pipes were still there with 1 km for each. When there is no heat network in ETM, al these units and km should be zero.
Problem
This issue follows #1558. @antw commented:
This interesting thing is that the scenario the LES was exported from doesn't have a heat network. So no costs at all should be assigned to heat source nor to heat assets.
The heat source lists gives units 0 for all plant types, but also gives 1 km distance. I think that is a standard setting.
Possible solution
Set both units and distance in heat source to 0 for scenarios without a heat network.
Screen shots
Heat source list
Heat asset list
Heat assets
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: