Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(quinn,quinn-udp): Introduce
net
feature to allow disablingsocket2
andstd::net::UdpSocket
dependencies #2037base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(quinn,quinn-udp): Introduce
net
feature to allow disablingsocket2
andstd::net::UdpSocket
dependencies #2037Changes from all commits
67cf8a7
73fd8b6
8b20acd
055e42a
38cec54
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of the many
cfg(feature = "net")
, wouldn't something along the following be simpler?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've got a version where I've experimented with that.
It's a much more invasive change, I'm not sure if it's much better?
I can add it to this PR if other people agree: n0-computer@d06b71b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the commit. I didn't think of the fact that
unix.rs
andwindows.rs
would need to be under thenet/
module.At this point I don't have a better idea, nor a preference for the options listed here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couldnt windows and unix stuff be stuffed under a "system" "sys" or something like that.