[QEff. Finetune] Adding the support to resume the fine tuning using pre computed #233
+5
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… prev run whoch would have stopped in between. There's no necessity to pass tokenizer_name if a model_name is passed. It will take the same name as model_name by default. If a different tokenizer_name is required than the model_name, then it can be passed separately as an argument. Signed-off-by: Swati Allabadi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding the support to resume the fine tuning using checkpoints from a prev run which would have stopped in between.
There's no necessity to pass tokenizer_name if a model_name is passed. It will take the same name as model_name by default.
If a different tokenizer_name is required than the model_name, then it can be passed separately as an argument in the command.