Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(scan): include exit code and reason in JSON result #555

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dylanpulver
Copy link
Collaborator

@dylanpulver dylanpulver commented Jul 29, 2024

Description:

This PR introduces enhancements to the scan and process_report functions to include the exit code and corresponding reason in the JSON result. This improvement aims to provide better insights into the scan outcomes, making it easier for the platform to understand and act upon the results. This also ensures that the exit code result will be in audit logs for historical data and for customers that ingest and parse and rely on this JSON output.

Changes Made:

  1. process_report Function:
  • Added parameters exit_code and exit_reason with default values (0 and "No vulnerabilities found." respectively).
  • Updated the JSON result to include the exit code and reason.
  1. scan Function:
  • Defined a mapping dictionary EXIT_CODE_REASON_MAPPING to map exit codes to their corresponding reasons.
  • Set the exit_reason based on the determined exit_code using the mapping dictionary.
  • Updated the process_report call to include exit_code and exit_reason.
  1. system_scan Function:
  • Ensured the process_report call includes default values for exit_code and exit_reason.

Details:

  • Mapping Exit Codes to Reasons: Introduced a dictionary EXIT_CODE_REASON_MAPPING in safety/constants.py to map predefined exit codes to user-friendly reason strings. This helps in providing clear and understandable reasons for each exit code.
  • Enhanced process_report: The process_report function now accepts and includes exit_code and exit_reason in the generated JSON report. This allows for more comprehensive reporting of scan results.
  • Modifications in scan and system_scan: Updated the scan function to determine and set exit_reason based on the exit_code. Similarly, ensured the system_scan function passes default values for these parameters to process_report.

Rationale:
Including the exit code and its corresponding reason in the JSON result enhances the clarity of scan reports. This improvement facilitates better decision-making and error handling on the platform, ultimately improving the user experience.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a mapping for exit codes to descriptive messages, enhancing clarity in error reporting.
    • Improved reporting capabilities in the scan process, including detailed JSON output with exit status and reasons.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced user feedback during scans by providing clear exit reasons based on the new mapping.
  • Style

    • Made formatting adjustments for improved code readability and consistency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the system's error handling and reporting capabilities by introducing a new exit code mapping dictionary. This addition clarifies the context of exit codes and improves the reporting function by incorporating exit status and reasons into JSON outputs. Overall, these modifications bolster user feedback and make the codebase more maintainable and informative.

Changes

Files Change Summary
safety/constants.py Introduced EXIT_CODE_REASON_MAPPING for descriptive exit code messages; no changes to existing codes.
safety/scan/command.py Modified process_report to add exit_code and exit_reason parameters, enhancing JSON reporting with clearer feedback; improved method for JSON serialization.

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Changes bring a joyful stop.
Exit codes now sing with glee,
Clarity for you and me! 🐇✨
With messages that clearly shout,
Bugs and errors, let's sort out!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a53da4 and 0295469.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • safety/constants.py (1 hunks)
  • safety/scan/command.py (32 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
safety/scan/command.py

472-472: Local variable fixes is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable fixes

(F841)

Additional comments not posted (6)
safety/constants.py (1)

166-178: Addition of EXIT_CODE_REASON_MAPPING is well-structured.

The new dictionary EXIT_CODE_REASON_MAPPING provides clear and descriptive messages for each exit code, enhancing the readability and maintainability of the codebase.

safety/scan/command.py (5)

52-53: New parameters exit_code and exit_reason are added to process_report.

The function signature now includes exit_code and exit_reason, which are essential for enhancing the reporting capabilities.


57-60: Inclusion of exit_code and exit_reason in JSON output.

The exit_code and exit_reason are correctly added to the JSON output, providing more detailed information about the scan results.


437-439: Determination of exit_reason based on exit_code.

The exit_reason is correctly determined using EXIT_CODE_REASON_MAPPING, ensuring that a descriptive reason is provided for each exit code.


439-439: Updated call to process_report includes exit_code and exit_reason.

The call to process_report now correctly includes the exit_code and exit_reason, enhancing the reporting functionality.


760-760: Updated call to process_report in system_scan includes default values.

The call to process_report now includes the default values for exit_code and exit_reason, ensuring consistency in the reporting functionality.

fixes = process_fixes_scan(file_to_fix,

fixes = process_fixes_scan(file_to_fix,
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Jul 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove unused variable fixes.

The variable fixes is assigned but never used, which is unnecessary.

- fixes = process_fixes_scan(file_to_fix,
-                            specs_to_fix, update_limits, output, no_output=no_output,
-                            prompt=prompt)
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
fixes = process_fixes_scan(file_to_fix,
process_fixes_scan(file_to_fix,
specs_to_fix, update_limits, output, no_output=no_output,
prompt=prompt)
Tools
Ruff

472-472: Local variable fixes is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable fixes

(F841)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i agree with coderabbit's suggested change here: remove fixes =

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"""

@jeff-at-safety, thanks for confirming the change. I'll proceed to remove the assignment to the fixes variable as suggested.


If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!

@dylanpulver
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I noticed that a datetime serialization error is thrown during testing. I don't believe this issue is directly related to the changes introduced here, but we could introduce datetime serialization logic to address it if needed. Specifically, we can add a custom serializer to handle datetime objects when generating the JSON result. Please let me know if you would like me to include this fix in the current PR!

fixes = process_fixes_scan(file_to_fix,

fixes = process_fixes_scan(file_to_fix,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i agree with coderabbit's suggested change here: remove fixes =

safety/scan/command.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0295469 and 5f47fa7.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • safety/scan/command.py (32 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • safety/scan/command.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants