PEP 757: Set status to Accepted #4140
Conversation
vstinner
force-pushed
the
pep757_accepted
branch
from
c7ce7a4
to
9692ad0
Compare
hugovk
changed the title
| @@ -4,11 +4,12 @@ Author: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>, | |||
| Victor Stinner <[email protected]> | |||
| PEP-Delegate: C API Working Group | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Has the SC confirmed the WG delegation for this PEP?
python/steering-council#259 says this PEP is special, and in general there is no standing delegation, but I don't see a clear decision regarding this PEP.
cc @Yhg1s
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PEP 757 was created from capi-workgroup/decisions#35 : it's a working document for the C API Working Group to help to take a decision. I created PEP 757 with PEP-Delegate: C API Working Group.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a misunderstanding on my side about the C API WG ability to handle their own PEPs.
I submitted PEP 757 to the Steering Council.
| Type: Standards Track | ||
| Created: 13-Sep-2024 | ||
| Python-Version: 3.14 | ||
| Post-History: `14-Sep-2024 <https://discuss.python.org/t/63895>`__ | ||
| Resolution: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-757-c-api-to-import-export-python-integers/63895/73 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can now include the date here too:
| Resolution: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-757-c-api-to-import-export-python-integers/63895/73 | |
| Resolution: `28-Nov-2024 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-757-c-api-to-import-export-python-integers/63895/73>`__ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, interesting, I will do the change when I will mark the PEP as Final.
This reverts commit 5074ef6.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4140.org.readthedocs.build/