-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 784
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update GC docs for incremental collection. #1379
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ simple type cast from the original object: :code:`((PyGC_Head *)(the_object)-1)` | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
As is explained later in the `Optimization: reusing fields to save memory`_ section, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
these two extra fields are normally used to keep doubly linked lists of all the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
objects tracked by the garbage collector (these lists are the GC generations, more on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
that in the `Optimization: generations`_ section), but they are also | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
that in the `Optimization: incremental collection`_ section), but they are also | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
reused to fulfill other purposes when the full doubly linked list structure is not | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
needed as a memory optimization. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -356,37 +356,68 @@ follows these steps in order: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
the reference counts fall to 0, triggering the destruction of all unreachable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
objects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Optimization: generations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
========================= | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Optimization: incremental collection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
==================================== | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to limit the time each garbage collection takes, the GC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
implementation for the default build uses a popular optimization: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
generations. The main idea behind this concept is the assumption that most | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
objects have a very short lifespan and can thus be collected soon after their | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation. This has proven to be very close to the reality of many Python | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
implementation for the default build uses incremental collection with two | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
generations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The purpose of generations is to take advantage of what is known as the weak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
generational hypothesis: Most objects die young. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This has proven to be very close to the reality of many Python | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
programs as many temporary objects are created and destroyed very quickly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To take advantage of this fact, all container objects are segregated into | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
three spaces/generations. Every new | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
object starts in the first generation (generation 0). The previous algorithm is | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
executed only over the objects of a particular generation and if an object | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
survives a collection of its generation it will be moved to the next one | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(generation 1), where it will be surveyed for collection less often. If | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
the same object survives another GC round in this new generation (generation 1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
it will be moved to the last generation (generation 2) where it will be | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
surveyed the least often. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The GC implementation for the free-threaded build does not use multiple | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
generations. Every collection operates on the entire heap. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
two generations: young and old. Every new object starts in the young generation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
willingc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To collect all unreachable cycles in the heap, the garbage collector must scan the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Perhaps add detection as distinct from collection.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
whole heap. This whole heap scan is called a cycle. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe consider a different term here (and throughout below) since "cycle" already has an important meaning here and it can be confusing if we overload it:
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe instead of cycle use "full scavenge". There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. A collection is an increment, so that's not a good term. Anyone have any other suggestions? I'll go with "scavenge" if not. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to limit the time each garbage collection takes, the previous algorithm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
is executed only on a portion of the heap called an increment. For each cycle, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
the increments will cover the whole heap. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Each increment, the portion of the heap scanned by a single collection is made up | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of three parts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* The young generation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* The oldest fraction of the old generation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* All any objects reachable from those objects that have not yet been scanned this cycle. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Any objects surviving this collection are moved to the old generation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe clarify that the objects that started in the old generation are considered "youngest of the old" instead of "oldest of the old" now (there's probably a better way of phrasing it). There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It isn't really the oldest, it is the "least recently scanned". I'll rework this section. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ollection from cycles. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When a cycle starts, no objects in the heap are considered to have been scanned. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Using cycle of a "reference cycle" and a "gc execution" it's a bit confusing, can we use other terminology? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've used "full scavenge" |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When all objects in the heap have been scanned a cycle ends, and all objects are | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
considered unscanned again. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to collect all unreachable cycles, each increment must contain all of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. To make sure that I understand this section on unreachable cycles, I think you're saying that we want to ensure that we fully capture the unreachable cycle because we want to ensure that the cycle is either fully gc'd or not, to avoid partial processing, which could be problematic later on? If so, maybe it's worth mentioning explicitly. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If we don't scan the full cycle at once, we cannot collect it. It is otherwise safe. The old generational collector would scan part cycles all the time; it just delayed the collection of the cycle, at worst until a full collection. With the incremental collector, if we only scan part of a cycle, it may never be collected. Which would be a problem. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
an unreachable cycle, or none of it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to make sure that the whole of any unreachable cycle is contained in an | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
increment, all unscanned objects reachable from any object in the increment must | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
be included in the increment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thus, to form a complete increment we perform a transitive closure ove reachable, unscanned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
savannahostrowski marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
objects from the initial increment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We can exclude scanned objects, as they must have been reachable when scanned. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If a scanned object becomes part of an unreachable cycle after being scanned, it | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
will not be collected this cycle, but it will be collected next cycle. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this can benefit from a concrete simple example showing how this can happen and how will be eventually cleaned. Either in English or with some diagram or pseudo code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The GC implementation for the free-threaded build does not use incremental collection. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This probably should be called out in an Important block. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Every collection operates on the entire heap. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to decide when to run, the collector keeps track of the number of object | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
allocations and deallocations since the last collection. When the number of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
allocations minus the number of deallocations exceeds ``threshold_0``, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
collection starts. Initially only generation 0 is examined. If generation 0 has | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
been examined more than ``threshold_1`` times since generation 1 has been | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
examined, then generation 1 is examined as well. With generation 2, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
things are a bit more complicated; see :ref:`gc-oldest-generation` for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
more information. These thresholds can be examined using the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
collection starts. ``threshold_1`` determines the fraction of the old | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
collection that is included in the increment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The fraction is inversely proportional to ``threshold_1``, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as historically a larger ``threshold_1`` meant that old generation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
collections were performed less frequency. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
``threshold2`` is ignored. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Correct as mentioned in @mr-bronson's message. Good catch @mr-bronson. 😄
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These thresholds can be examined using the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
:func:`gc.get_threshold` function: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.. code-block:: python | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -399,6 +430,10 @@ more information. These thresholds can be examined using the | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The content of these generations can be examined using the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
``gc.get_objects(generation=NUM)`` function and collections can be triggered | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
specifically in a generation by calling ``gc.collect(generation=NUM)``. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to 3.13, there we three generations. For that reason the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
young generation is generation 0, but the old generation is generation 2. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For compatibility, ``gc.get_objects()`` pretends there is a generation 1, but it is always empty. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.. code-block:: python | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -407,8 +442,8 @@ specifically in a generation by calling ``gc.collect(generation=NUM)``. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
... pass | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# Move everything to the last generation so it's easier to inspect | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# the younger generations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# Move everything to the old generation so it's easier to inspect | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# the young generations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>>> gc.collect() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -418,43 +453,24 @@ specifically in a generation by calling ``gc.collect(generation=NUM)``. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
>>> x = MyObj() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>>> x.self = x | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# Initially the object is in the youngest generation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# Initially the object is in the young generation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>>> gc.get_objects(generation=0) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[..., <__main__.MyObj object at 0x7fbcc12a3400>, ...] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# After a collection of the youngest generation the object | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# moves to the next generation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# moves to the old generation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>>> gc.collect(generation=0) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>>> gc.get_objects(generation=0) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>>> gc.get_objects(generation=1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>>> gc.get_objects(generation=2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[..., <__main__.MyObj object at 0x7fbcc12a3400>, ...] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.. _gc-oldest-generation: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collecting the oldest generation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-------------------------------- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In addition to the various configurable thresholds, the GC only triggers a full | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
collection of the oldest generation if the ratio ``long_lived_pending / long_lived_total`` | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
is above a given value (hardwired to 25%). The reason is that, while "non-full" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
collections (that is, collections of the young and middle generations) will always | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
examine roughly the same number of objects (determined by the aforementioned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
thresholds) the cost of a full collection is proportional to the total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of long-lived objects, which is virtually unbounded. Indeed, it has | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
been remarked that doing a full collection every <constant number> of object | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creations entails a dramatic performance degradation in workloads which consist | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of creating and storing lots of long-lived objects (for example, building a large list | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of GC-tracked objects would show quadratic performance, instead of linear as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
expected). Using the above ratio, instead, yields amortized linear performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in the total number of objects (the effect of which can be summarized thusly: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"each full garbage collection is more and more costly as the number of objects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
grows, but we do fewer and fewer of them"). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Optimization: reusing fields to save memory | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
=========================================== | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.